Posts tagged with: "Enlarged-Board-of-Appeal"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2013, 8:58 am
Accordingly, we call upon the President of the EPO to refer a question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal to ensure uniform application of the law, and make Tufty’s law established EPO case law. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
T 986/93 [2.4]).[2.5] In its decision G 9/91 mentioned above the Enlarged Board of appeal has defined the conditions for an examination of grounds for opposition invoked after expiry of the time limit for filing an opposition by stating that there had to be prima facie relevant reasons for the grounds for opposition to be relevant and [that those reasons] would make it impossible to maintain the patent in its entirety or partly.In the present case the amendment concerns a… [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
This opinion of the Enlarged Board of Appeal, which did not deal with the question of the equitableness of the reimburse [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 1:50 pm
The governing body had asked the competent Enlarged Board to recommend the dismissal of the judge. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 7:50 am
The Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) decision G1/18 was recently published in French (IPKat post here). [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
In decision G 9/91 [19], the Enlarged Board of Appeal confirmed that in case of amendments of the claims or other parts of a patent in the course of opposition or appeal proceedings, «such amendments are to be fully examined as to their compatibility with the requirements of the EPC». [4.1.4] However, according to the jurisprudence of the boards of appeal, there are limits to the competence accorded by A 101(3) as regards the… [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 1:00 pm
The UK-IPO will have an opportunity to submit observations to the Enlarged Board of Appeal on the questions put to it. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 2:39 pm
Merpel has finally had sight of the written decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) in which it rejected the request made by the Administrative Council (AC) chairman, Mr Kongstad, seeking the dismissal of a Board Member for the events leading up to the House Ban.We knew that the EBA had rejected Mr Kongstad's request, for Mr. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
In this respect the Board concurs with R 17/11 [19] in which the Enlarged Board of Appeal made it clear that in appeal proceedings it is upon a party to make sure that the points it wishes to raise are actually raised in the proceedings. [read post]
3 May 2019, 3:47 am
In a communication annexed to the summons, the board gave its preliminary opinion that the appeal appeared to be inadmissible. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
The decision under appeal should therefore be set aside and the appeal fee be reimbursed. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 11:01 am
R 108(3) also empowers the Enlarged Board to order replacement of members of the Board of Appeal who participated in the impugned decision. [7]With the exception of that last measure which is discretionary, the outcome of a successful petition is therefore prescribed by legislation. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
This petition for review was filed after Board 3.2.04 had revoked the opposed patent (claiming a dry-cooking fryer) in decision T 1572/11.I found the discussion of “adverse effect 2” instructive:*** Translation of the French original ***[3] The letters of the petitioner […] as well as its declarations made during the oral proceedings (OPs) before the Enlarged Board (EBA) make clear that, although the petitioner considers that the ‘adverse effect… [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:16 am
A referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal should be considered if this decision diverges from the older decision T 0848/93.Reasons for the Decision1. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:16 am
A referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal should be considered if this decision diverges from the older decision T 0848/93.Reasons for the Decision1. [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:01 pm
As the Enlarged Board (EBA) put it “To take the principle of good faith that far would imply, in practice, that the BoA would have to systematically assume the responsibilities of the parties to proceedings before them, a proposition for which there is no legal justification in the EPC or in general principles of law”, see G 2/97 [4.2]. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 6:54 pm
Katfriend Henning Hartwig (Bardehle Pagenberg) reported on the new decision of the EU General Court on the validity of a registered Community design in light of a piece of prior art that only showed a two-dimensional view of the design.PatentsRose Hughes shared the news of the referral of three questions to the Enlarged Board of Appeal on how and if the description should be used to interpret the claims of a patent when assessing… [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 12:08 pm
He was Chairman of the Code of Practice for the Promotion of Animal Medicines Committee from 2002 to 2008, an Appointed Person hearing trade mark appeals from 2003 to 2008 and a Deputy High Court Judge from 2004 to 2008.He was appointed to be Judge in Charge of the Patents Court in April 2013 and as an External Member of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office in March 2016.The University of Westminster recognised Sir Richard for his… [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 1:49 am
No point of law referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal J. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 5:15 am
The latest referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal - G 1/11 - poses a question which is going to register many notches lower on the interest scale for everyone, other than a small number of EPO officials. [read post]
