Posts tagged with: "Enlarged-Board-of-Appeal"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am
OJ EPO 2015, Supplementary publication No. 1, II.3) decided to enlarge its composition to three technically qualified members and two legally qualified members in accordance with Article 9 of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA) and Article 21(4)(b) EPC 1973.XII. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 1:48 am
The Board of Appeal in T 1989/19 provides further guidance on the interpretation of the Enlarged Board of Appeal decision G2/21. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 2:14 pm
Katfriend Henry Yang summarised the reasoning of the Court of Appeal thereto in the recent case of Autostore v Ocado.GuestKat Rose Hughes considered the tricky balance to be struck in determining when pre-clinical data plausibly supports a therapeutic effect, as was raised in a recent Board of Appeal decision (T 966/18). [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 12:56 am
The request for referral to the Enlarged Board of AppealSince the conditions laid down in Article 112 EPC are not fulfilled in the sense that no discrepancy exists in the case law and no new point of law of fundamental importance arises from the present case, the request for referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal must be dismissed.4. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
* AMBA speaks - with a brand new websiteAMBA is the Association of the Members of the Boards of Appeal, and has just launched a brand-new website, writes Merpel. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
In particular with regard to fresh grounds for opposition, for the above reasons the Enlarged Board considers that such grounds may in principle not be introduced at the appeal stage” (emphasis added by the Board).[1.3.1] As admitted by the [patent proprietor] at the OPs clarity does not represent a ground of opposition as specified in A 100(a) to 100(c). [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 12:36 am
The Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) recently dealt thoroughly with the thorny issue of the consequences of appeal fee payment after the deadline for filing an appeal (G 1/18, IPKat post here). [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 6:44 am
In the absence of any convincing reasons, the Board was likely to refuse to admit it into the appeal proceedings pursuant to Article 12(4) RPBA.The arguments in the statement of grounds of appeal focused entirely on the amended feature added on appeal. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 6:44 am
In the absence of any convincing reasons, the Board was likely to refuse to admit it into the appeal proceedings pursuant to Article 12(4) RPBA.The arguments in the statement of grounds of appeal focused entirely on the amended feature added on appeal. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Supreme Court denied the Town's motion and the Town appealed. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Supreme Court denied the Town's motion and the Town appealed. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
In its petition for review the opponent argued that Board 3.2.03 had violated its right to be heard in opposition case T 928/10.The petitioner explained that it had requested a hearing of the witnesses Namensen and Karlsson in its statement of grounds of appeal. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 11:54 pm
This crisis had two elements: the narrower issue of the “House Ban” affair, i.e. the President suspending a Board of Appeal member in apparent breach of both his powers and the principle of judicial independence; and the broader issue of whether judicial independence could be said to exist in any event given the structure of the Boards of Appeal within the European Patent Organisation. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:48 am
Last week, Rose reported that the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) has decided to reschedule oral proceedings in G1/21, where the issue of ViCo is to be decided, following a request from one of the parties, who claimed not having been given sufficient time to consider the EPO’s President submissions on the referral.Trade marksThe trade marks section of The IPKat included an interesting double feature. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 12:34 pm
PatentsThe Kluwer Patent blog reports on the EPO Board of Appeal's decision in case T 1063/18 and the following Patent Law Committee meeting which addressed different potential options and supported measures to obtain an opinion from the Enlarged Board of Appeal. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Based on decision T 384/91 in connection with decision G 1/93, and on decision G 9/91, it reasoned as follows: In decision G 1/93, the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) had defined the conditions under which a patent could be maintained unamended despite it containing subject matter extending beyond the content of the application as filed. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:25 am
Does it help to submit an expert opinion regarding added matter in a divisional application (Art. 76(1) EPC), when the expert is a well-known former chair of a technical Board of Appeal and member of the Enlarged Board of Appeal? [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 9:54 am
| A Question of Priorities: 2019 Boards of Appeal Year in Review | The Year of the Pepper: 2019 Enlarged Board of Appeal Year in Review | Never Too Late: if you missed The IPKat last week | Tuesday Thingies | Paris Court of Appeal confirms that Koons’s ‘Naked’ sculpture infringes copyright in ‘Enfants’ photograph, rejecting freedom of the arts and parody defences [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
Rogers.The petitioner had asked the Enlarged Board (EBA) to order a change of composition, but this request was refused.P. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
On appeal, the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM upheld the decision concerning the applicability of Article 7(1)(b) and (c), but remitted the case to the Examination Division for re-examination of the applicability of Article 7(3). [read post]
