Posts tagged with: "Enlarged-Board-of-Appeal" Results 601 - 620 of 1,196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The opponents thought it should not, and pointed out that this question of law had been answered differently by the Boards, which justified the referral of the following question to the Enlarged Board of appeal (EBA):Is a patent proprietor who has withdrawn the subject-matter of a main request before the OD (in the present case, the request to maintain the patent as granted), entitled to pursue this subject-matter in the appeal proceedings? [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 7:18 am
Undisclosed disclaimers are (at least) permissible to restore novelty by delimiting a claim against state of the art under Article 54(3) and (4) EPC, to restore novelty by delimiting a claim against an accidental anticipation under Article 54(2) EPC and to disclaim subject-matter which, under Articles 52 to 57 EPC, is excluded from patentability for non-technical reasons.In appeal T6810/07-3308, the TBA is now asking the Enlarged Board of Appeal:Does a disclaimer infringe… [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 9:53 am by Joe Mullin
 IPR proceedings against patents held by public universities have been canceled on at least two occasions, when the Patent Trial and Appeals Board held that the universities benefit from sovereign immunity because they are state actors. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 10:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
As of November 7, 2013 the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) has received 627 IPR petitions and 78 CBM petitions, 709 petitions in total. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 1:36 pm by Jon Brodkin
The BBB National Advertising Division (NAD) ruled against AT&T last month and the carrier appealed to the National Advertising Review Board (NARB), which has now also ruled against AT&T.Read 11 remaining paragraphs | Comments [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:40 am by Joe Mullin
  Allergan made the unprecedented move because it will prevent any meaningful challenge to the company's patents at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, or PTAB. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 12:44 pm by Ashley Belanger
That could take a month, and at any point, Meta could appeal either decision.Read 3 remaining paragraphs | Comments [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 10:04 am
Others, however, may prefer to wait until the Enlarged Board make their decision, which might just arrive in time for this case to be decided all over again at the Court of Appeal. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
As of January 9, 2014 the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) has received 810 IPR petitions and 108 CBM petitions, 922 petitions in total. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Referring to the principle of party disposition, the Enlarged Board of Appeal confirmed that the appeal proceedings are terminated after the appeal is withdrawn in so far as the substantive issues are concerned (G 8/91 [4,5], see also decision G 2/91 [6.1]). [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 12:20 pm
The IPKat reported in a post dated 11 June 2007 of a referral having been made to the EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal (G 2/07) on the subject of whether a process involving crossing and selection of broccoli could be patentable. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 2:54 pm
It covers, in particular, the reorganisation of the EPO Guidelines, the abandonment of the legal advices and their incorporation into the EPO Guidelines, the changes to the procedure for grant under amended R.71 and new R.71a and the new sanction provided by amended R.53(3) for failure to translate the priority; as well as various new decisions of the Enlarged Board of Appeal and new developments in Board of Appeal case law. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:32 pm
.* BREAKING: Court of Appeal of England and Wales confirms availability of blocking injunctions in online trade mark casesThe Court of Appeal upheld  the decision of Arnold J, confirming that blocking injunctions are available against intermediaries in trade mark cases. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:15 am by Söğüt Atilla
Our Katfriend considers this “open use” strategy a novel approach to colour branding in the digital age.PatentsRose Hughes analysed the recent decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal (T 1994/22) which restricted reliance on post-published evidence to demonstrate patentability (introduced by G 2/21). [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 3:00 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This question has not been addressed by the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) in the pertinent decisions (cf. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In accordance with decision G 9/91 of the Enlarged Board of Appeal and decision T 240/04 the appellant’s present request should thus not be admitted into the proceedings under Article 13(1) RPBA. [3.2] The [patent proprietor] pointed out that a request directed to use claims had in fact already been filed during opposition proceedings. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
We have a new referral to the Enlarged Board of appeal (EBA), pending under the reference G 1/13.In this case an opposition had been filed on November 2, 2004, in the name of Formalities Bureau Limited, a company governed by the law of the United Kingdom. [read post]