Posts tagged with: "Enlarged-Board-of-Appeal" Results 101 - 120 of 1,196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2018, 8:19 am by Guido Paola
Indeed in the petition for review procedure the members of the Enlarged Board are also members of the Boards of Appeal thereby ignoring the fundamental principles according to Article 125 EPC. [read post]
referred three questions of law to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (now handled as G 1/23) in order to resolve a perceived divergence in the case law. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 2:00 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The President of the EPO expressed his view that  a President's  referral of the case to the Enlarged Board of Appeal is justified and necessary. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 6:05 am
Referral G 1/15 ("Partial priority") is pending before the Enlarged Board of Appeal. [read post]
The announcement in the second preliminary opinion of Technical Board of Appeal (TBA) 3.3.04 in T 56/21, suggesting a referral of this question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal, combined with the sole appellant’s agreement with such a referral and perhaps a modicum of personal inertia, has kept us from it. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 1:34 am by Rose Hughes
The EPO yesterday announced the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) decision in G1/21 (ViCo oral proceedings). [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 am by Roel van Woudenberg
While the current appeal was pending, the President referred questions to the Enlarged Board. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:02 am by Marie Louise
  Highlights this week included: Biological inventions – EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal faced the second time with the tomato case (EPLAW) (IPKat) No new moves to compulsory licensing in China, say experts (IAM) [...] [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:27 am by James Nurton
The Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) of the European Patent Office published opinion G 3/19 “Pepper” on Thursday, May 14, holding that plants and animals exclusively obtained by means of an essentially biological process are excluded from patentability. [read post]
17 May 2016, 2:34 am by Jessica Soultanian-Braunstein
On March 22, 2016, the Board of Standards and Appeals conditionally approved a variance to construct an additional floor onto the Bais Yaakov D’ Chasidei Gur religious school, located at 1975 51st Street in the Borough Park neighborhood of Brooklyn. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 8:19 pm
  One is the apparent erosion of the independence of the Boards of Appeal. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 12:17 am by Roel van Woudenberg
 EP 2 753 168) for the sole reason that the claimed subject-matter falls within the exception to patentability according to Article 53(b) and Rule 28(2) EPC (here: plants exclusively obtained by means of an essentially biological process).At the oral proceedings, which took place on 5 December 2018, Technical Board of Appeal  3304, in an enlarged composition consisting of three technically and two legally qualified members, held that Rule… [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 4:14 am by Jessica Kroeze
Picture: Mercedes-Benz-Caravan by FotoArt-Treu on PixabayAs reported earlier on this blog, the Enlarged Board of Appeal will have to decide whether or not the Boards of Appeal may properly summon parties to oral proceedings at their premises in Haar.Alluding to this pending referral, in the present case T0403/18 one of the parties present at an oral hearing in Haar requested that this hearing be held in Munich. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 3:27 pm
The following is Sean's take on a decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal at the European Patent Office that struck his attention: An Appeal on the Ground of Irrationality In response to Jeremy's recent call-to-arms for more blog contributors, I decided to chip in with a short article about a recent decision by the Enlarged Board of Appeal (BoA) at the EPO. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 6:52 pm by Patent Docs
Ravi Srinivasan and Guy Brain of J A Kemp will cover recent developments in the assessment of whether a "plausible" disclosure of efficacy is present in the application as filed, including a discussion of the decision T 116/18 which has for the first time referred the topic of plausibility to the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (pending as G 2/21). [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read (the differences with respect to the claim as refused by the ED are apparent; click to enlarge): The Board examines whether the amendments comply with the requirements of A 123(2): [4.1] Claim 1 as originally filed relates to ? [read post]
It was hoped that the decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) of the EPO in G 2/21 would bring clarity. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 2:26 am by Diane Tweedlie
As held by the Enlarged Board of Appeal in decision G 1/97 (OJ EPO 2000, 322), the jurisdictional measure to be taken in response to requests based on the alleged violation of a fundamental procedural principle and aimed at the revision of a final decision of a board of appeal should be the refusal of the requests as inadmissible. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 9:42 am by Mark Reichel
The European Patent Office (EPO) recently announced that its Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) is accepting written statements regarding pending referral G 3/08 pertaining to the patentability of computer programs. [read post]