Posts tagged with: "government-surveillance" Results 3221 - 3240 of 12,187
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2008, 11:14 am
Apparently, he or she can tell you if the government is secretly monitoring your mail. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 9:56 am
Rather, we are slowly inching, through each act of fear mongering and fecklessness, pandering and political compromise, toward a world in which Americans have increasingly little say over how they are actually governed, and increasingly little control over how the government collects information on them to regulate and control them. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 8:08 am
Finally, when faced with the clear wording of FISA and Title III that these statutes provide the 'exclusive means' for the government to engage in electronic surveillance within the United States for foreign intelligence purposes, the conclusion becomes inescapable that the TSP was unlawful. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 3:43 pm
Bush publicly acknowledged the so-called Terror Surveillance Program. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 10:35 am
Bush authorized the National Security Agency ('NSA') to conduct a warrantless communications surveillance program. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:16 am by Rekha Arulanantham
The constitutionality of the government’s surveillance powers can and should be tested in court. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 9:48 pm
Here's the answer:[T]his language is designed to codify the traditional intelligence community notion of having a surveillance "target. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 7:07 am
Under the old FISA, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) would rule on government applications for wiretapping. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 7:34 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
  The threats to privacy of these surveillance technologies are enormous, as law enforcement agencies at all levels of government use surveillance technologies to compile vast databases filled with our personal information or gain access to devices that can lay bare the intricacies of our daily lives. [read post]
7 Apr 2025, 6:05 am by Hannah James
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Section 702 of FISA authorizes the government to collect the electronic communications of foreigners located abroad without a warrant. [read post]
6 May 2013, 10:33 am by Josh Bell
Attorneys’ offices paint a troubling picture of the government’s email surveillance practices. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 12:40 pm by davidruiz
Let’s say a contractor with Booz Allen Hamilton—the same contracting agency Edward Snowden briefly worked for when he confirmed widespread government surveillance to The Guardian in 2013—believes she has found evidence of an abuse of authority. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 9:33 am by Adam Schwartz
Electronic Shackles EFF regularly advocates before judges and legislators to protect our location privacy from unreasonable electronic surveillance by the government, most often to prevent police from secretly turning our cell phones into tracking devices. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 8:52 am by Danny O'Brien
Since then, the Chinese government has doubled down on laws which would make targeted surveillance even easier. [read post]
14 May 2019, 5:00 pm
Facebook and the government’s surveillance machinery seem intertwined. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:02 am by Andrew Crocker
In the law enforcement context, the government routinely exploits vulnerabilities to install malware, also called “network investigative techniques” or NITs, to identify suspects and conduct remote surveillance. [read post]
The Government, government agencies and even private corporations are able to use surveillance camera technologies in the name of public safety and security. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 12:27 pm
" That is to say, even if you were not the original target of the surveillance, the government can make use of and disseminate information about you if your international phone calls or e-mails reveal evidence of any crime. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:31 am by Rachel Gerber
A US appeals court ruled [opinion, PDF] on Monday that a nondisclosure requirement in the National Security Letters (NSL) [text] law does not conflict with the First Amendment. [read post]