Posts tagged with: "government-surveillance" Results 3261 - 3280 of 12,190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2023, 5:51 am by Asha Rangappa
Title I of FISA is the exclusive statutory means through which the government can directly surveil any USPERs within the United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 9:20 pm by Stan
In the area of security and surveillance, the government needs what it needs, and protectionism has to take a back seat. [read post]
2 May 2012, 9:05 am by Jay Stanley
The net result is that the government can use it for surveillance but individuals cannot use it to watch the government. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 4:05 pm by Inside Privacy
 The court explained that “[e]lectronic surveillance by the government is increasing, and the need to balance this government tool with the Fourth Amendment is required. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 5:49 am by Senator Ron Wyden
Early last November, a bipartisan, bicameral group of U.S. senators and representatives introduced the Government Surveillance Reform Act (GSRA). [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:39 pm by Albert Gidari
The Commission has no privacy officer and no privacy policy to govern its conduct. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:10 pm by andrew
As a result, the Internet and communications companies that we all trust with our most sensitive information cannot be truthful with their customers and the public about the scope of government surveillance. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 6:30 am by JB
The basic elements of the ideology are that the constitution "(1) establishes a comprehensive scheme of government, founded (2) on the principle of representative government and (3) on the need to divide, channel, and constrain governmental powers for the purpose of safeguarding individual liberty. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am by Elizabeth Goitein
But the surveillance inevitably sweeps in Americans’ communications, as well. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:55 am by Elizabeth Goitein
But it does require the government, when seeking to conduct electronic surveillance of an American for foreign intelligence purposes, to show probable cause to the FISA Court that (1) the target of surveillance is a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power, and (2) the facilities to be surveilled are being used by a foreign power or agent of a foreign power. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 8:16 am
And here, my friends, is a classic Catch-22: according to the government, any ability that the plaintiffs may have in this case, or any case for that matter to prove they have been and/or are under surveillance is actually protected by the state secrets privilege and basically never existed. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 4:10 pm by Nathan Mattise
This weekend, the US government filed documents in two long-running cases (both in California's Northern District) related to NSA surveillance. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 4:10 pm by Nathan Mattise
This weekend, the US government filed documents in two long-running cases (both in California's Northern District) related to National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 3:36 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
But we’ve seen too much surveillance double-speak from the government to take those statements at face value. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 11:21 am by Benjamin Wittes
The most likely answer, as Kris and Wilson argue, is that such digital eavesdropping would now be covered by 50 U.S.C. 1801(f)(4), which was originally primarily intended to cover surveillance using hidden microphones or cameras, but now also governs the acquisition of stored e-mails and documents from U.S. servers. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 1:38 pm by Greg Nojeim
Justice Ginsburg asked whether that zone would be confined to the home if the government won its case (to which the government helpfully offered that the protected zone would also include car interiors and letters in the mail.)Justices wanted to draw a clear line that law enforcement could follow about when GPS surveillance required a warrant, but suggested that they were receiving little help from the parties in where that line should be drawn. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 2:20 am
He is also considering whether to revive the only other suit over the surveillance program, filed by an Islamic charity that said it learned it had been wiretapped in a secret document that the government inadvertently provided.Walker dismissed that suit in July, saying the Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation - a now-defunct organization that was on the U.S. government's terrorist list - could not rely on the secret document to show that it had been a target of… [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:14 pm by David Kravets
Walker did not declare the administration’s so-called Terrorist Surveillance Program unconstitutional, and he declined to issue punitive damages to punish the government for wiretapping in the country without warrants. [read post]