Posts tagged with: "public+interest"
Results 9221 - 9240
of 152,171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2011, 8:28 pm
A training site for the federal judiciary’s Public Access to CourtElectronic Records (PACER) service recently became available. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 9:44 pm
The company's newsletter, released yesterday, provides links to two important articles of interest to family law lawyers and the Canadian public. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 7:12 am
Here is an article about an interesting case filed recently in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 3:09 pm
My current and former colleagues, Craig Nard and Andrew Morriss, think that an interest group-based analysis provides the answer, and... [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 10:04 am
If you're interested in the... [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:41 am
Having just returned from speaking at a great conference hosted by the First Amendment Law Review at UNC on all things Garcetti, it is interesting to see many of the various issues discussed there come to the fore in a... [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 9:42 pm
The Washington Post offers this report on a very interesting set of proposals. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:18 pm
For those of you interested in the forthcoming book, World Class Actions, here’s a quick update. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 8:54 am
Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd Queen’s Bench Division “It was not for the media to expose sexual conduct between consenting adults which did not involve any significant breach of the criminal law except where there was a countervailing public interest because at least one of the established limiting principles, such as victimisation or corruption of the young, came into play. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:04 am
Interested in law firm trade names? [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 8:57 pm
State Court and County (SCCLL) is a Special Interest Group of the American Association of Law Libraries (AALL): The SCCLL Resource Guide #3 is now officially published and ready to be sent out from AALL HQ. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 6:47 am
Interesting articles from a range of perspectives here.LAW AND MORALITY FOREWORD A FOUNDER'S RETROSPECTIVE: THE JOURNAL AT 30 YEARS Spencer Abraham 1 SYMPOSIUM LAW AND MORALITY: THE TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL NATIONAL FEDERALIST SOCIETY STUDENT SYMPOSIUM ON LAW AND PUBLIC POLICYâ€â [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:17 pm
Nobody deserves to have their personality dissected on a gossip blog like ATL as punishment for publishing a law review note about public interest -- not even if the law review note is a crappy piece of non-scholarship (which it is). [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 8:28 pm
Sally Satel has an interesting article in yesterday's New York Times science section on how to fight the stigma of mental illness. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 2:25 am
The Campaign for Freedom of Information in Scotland is running two half-day training courses in Glasgow on 14 September 2009 and Aberdeen on 15 September 2009.The courses, which are aimed at those with a good working knowledge of the legislation, will highlight key developments in the way the main exemptions, the public interest test and the legislation's procedural requirements are being interpreted. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 5:49 pm
Why aren't more powerful public women caught up in sex scandals? [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:04 am
Interested in law firm trade names? [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:15 am
The reason I get so excited about the rising number of public companies is because it means more & more interesting businesses – and more & more great people – are joining our community. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 7:25 pm
Some public entities saw it as a positive to continue to involve the consultant who has the most knowledge about the challenges presented by contamination at the property. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 6:02 am
We're at the beginning of this conversation, neither the Arnold Foundation assessment nor any other represents the last word on what these tools will finally look like.But even at these early stages, it's possible to identify and dismiss disingenuous and self-interested criticisms, particularly those which ask us to judge risk-assessment errors in a context-free environment. [read post]
