Posts tagged with: "public+interest"
Results 9241 - 9260
of 152,171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2006, 9:30 pm
Today's panels of interest to the readers of this blog include:10:15-11:45 a.m.: Social Welfare and Public Finance Location Organizer/Moderator: Robert Wassmer (California... [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 9:36 pm
(I missed the original broadcast on Thursday night because I was out fulfilling my public interest auction responsibilities â€â [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 10:29 pm
The guide, published in collaboration with the Inns of Court, is the latest in a series of publications designed to [...] [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 3:03 am
The detailed letter raises various areas of concern, including the fact that "promoting and protecting the public interest" is not set out as a regulatory objective. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 9:54 pm
This press release begins: "Today the Midwest Democracy Network (MDN) - a nonpartisan alliance of 20 civic and public interest groups from Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio and Wisconsin - released former U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
The proper venue is the County Court, but we knew that - although the direction for a CJ to hear it is interesting. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
The first is that managers have incentives to further their own interests. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 10:00 pm
this action involved enforcement of an important right affecting the public interest and ... it conferred a significant benefit upon a large class of persons or the general public. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:44 pm
On the other hand, MinLaw expressed interest in removing letter (e) Sections 35 and 109 CA, relevant for fair dealing. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:24 am
This Kat suspects that - due to its appealing (also to the general public) focus - this particular public consultation will see the involvement of many interest groups and attract several responses, possibly more [but that does not seem too difficult] than the (mere) 1036 responses received by the public consultation on online intermediaries and platforms. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 10:35 am
APS encourages interested parties to participate in a bidder's webinar on August 29, 2012. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 7:08 am
The Office of the Privacy Commissioner has put out a call for participation and written submissions by interested parties are due by March 15, 2010. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 11:24 am
This exemption shallnot apply unless the public body shows that in the particularinstance the public interest in encouraging frank communicationbetween officials and employees of public bodies clearlyoutweighs the public interest in disclosure. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 8:12 pm
Geoff Cockrell and I recently co-authored an article on private equity investments in the dialysis sector in Law360 (a LexisNexis legal publication). [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:12 pm
It’s an interesting and unusual request, but this has been an interesting and unusual case. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Revelation of Plaintiff's Gambling Addiction Doesn't Justify Pseudonymity or Sealing
16 Oct 2020, 6:13 am
While there is no identifiable prejudice to defendant in allowing plaintiff to remain anonymous, plaintiff cannot show that the need for anonymity in this case outweighs the public's interest in the proceedings. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 2:39 pm
The post Op-Ed: Protecting Access to Effective Counsel is in Everyone’s Best Interest appeared first on Innocence Project. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
My bet is that this might have been one of the most interesting and memorable lessons that Brown’s students learned that year. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:39 am
There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 10:05 am
The court upheld the rule that corporations may not practice law in Arkansas, and that public policy prevented concurrent conflict of interest that cannot be waived by the insurance carrier's insured, due to "the inability of any person to faithfully serve two masters. [read post]
