Posts tagged with: "supreme+court" Results 7541 - 7560 of 349,231
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2024, 7:06 am by Ellena Erskine
ShareEach weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
LEXIS 9 (Jan. 30, 2024) [see § 51.02 n. 10.1], the Supreme Court of New Hampshire reversed and remanded a decision by the state’s Compensation Appeals Board (CAB) that denied benefits to a teacher who sustained a serious MRSA epidural abscess following a work-related camping trip, finding the CAB had improperly concentrated on whether the teacher had proved that his MRSA exposure occurred at work. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 6:57 am by Rick Hasen
Politico: Donald Trump’s effort to assemble false slates of presidential electors in 2020 may wind up shielding special counsel Jack Smith’s case from a Supreme Court ruling that could sharply narrow the obstruction law at the heart of the indictment… Continue reading The post “Jack Smith: False elector scheme saves Trump obstruction charges” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 6:30 am by ernst
A descendent of Pound donated to the New York State Court of Appeals (the Court) correspondence from Cardozo to Pound spanning the period from 1932-1934 when Cardozo sat on the United States Supreme Court (the Supreme Court), and Pound served as Chief Judge of the Court—having been appointed by Governor Franklin D. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 6:07 am by Above the Law
[Bloomberg Law News] * Jack Smith asks Supreme Court to ditch Trump's "presidents are immune from all laws" argument because it's... dumb. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 5:10 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Among the more interesting briefs filed on behalf of respondents is an amicus brief for Stephen McAllister and Scott Paul (with Erik Jaffe and James Heilpern on brief as counsel) argues that existing precedents on presidential immunity lack a textual basis and that, if the Supreme Court's majority is to be as textualist as it purports to be, it should not extend or build upon this non-textual precedent. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 4:58 am by Beatrice Yahia
” Preliminary hearings held yesterday and today are focused solely on Nicaragua’s request for provisional measures, including a court order for Berlin to halt military and other aid to Israel and reinstate funding to the U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 4:34 am by SHG
Sure, the Supreme Court rejected Biden’s last attempt to bootstrap emergency powers into shifting billions off the shoulders of the students who signed for the loans and got the benefit of a college education and onto the taxpayer, who may or may not have enjoyed any benefit or scrimped and saved to put himself though college, unaware that he could have bought a Lambo instead and waited until his student loans were forgiven. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
The post Today in Supreme Court History: April 9, 1923 appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Marc Bhalla
My favourite example of this is the mascot of the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 11:00 pm
And when the New York County Supreme Court denied that request, the company appealed.On its review of the dispute, the Appellate Division, First Department, reiterated the factors that typically govern such applications, and noted that a court may consider "the burden on the New York courts, the potential hardship to the defendant, and the unavailability of an alternative forum in which plaintiff may bring suit …. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
For L&E-specific podcasts, see: The Metaverse and L&E Podcast (Tim Taylor) Recent Supreme Court Rulings Impacting Labor & Employment Podcast (Tim Taylor) The Court Closes with LGBTQ Rights and Biden Debt Plan Podcast (Law 360) The Supreme Court Guts Affirmative Action Podcast (Law 360) Want the Sabbath Off? [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Anonymous Plaintiff 1 might yet be reversed by the Indiana Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:42 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Via Amee Vanderpool – “Nineteen retired generals and officials have filed a 38-page amicus brief with the Supreme Court opposing Trump’s immunity from criminal prosecution claim, saying Trump’s immunity argument is “an assault on…foundational commitments. [read post]