Search for: "Alexander v. United Technologies Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
A dissenting judge argued that one of the patents contained plausibly valid claims that recited technical improvements to a graphical user interface (International Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:45 pm by Harold O'Grady
Supreme Court twice in 1888, first with The Telephone Cases (126 U.S. 1), and then with United States v. [read post]
8 May 2016, 6:24 pm by Dennis Crouch
One issue the majority ignored in Stanford is the future interest assignment rule created by the Federal Circuit in Filmtec Corp. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 9:10 pm by The Regulatory Review
The current debate over defining the “waters of the United States” took shape in 2015, when EPA and the Army Corps under the Obama Administration finalized a groundbreaking clean water rule. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
: (IPEG),EU CORDIS launches a new web service for joint research initiatives: (IPR Helpdesk),EC announces plan to create single, EU-wide market for online music, films, and video games: (Ars Technica)GermanyGermans shun patents, but press for patent valuation ISO: (IPKat)Hong KongCreative commons Hong Kong begins public discussion (Creativecommons.com)IndiaBlawging our way to the front pages of Business Standard: (Spicy IP),Bootleg baloney: It's music to… [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 United Technologies Corp., 487 U.S. 500 (1988) Wyeth v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
XX v HMRC (IP finance) United States US Patents  ‘Sub-standard’ patents cost the US economy over $25 billion a year. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
  Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In an interview on ABC radio John Menadue, a former head of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, has called News Corp a “rogue organisation. [read post]