Search for: "Anderson, Jr. v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 95
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The argument that the United States made is: “Look, to the extent that Idaho doesn’t allow doctors to provide the kind of stabilizing care that EMTALA requires them to provide, the federal statute trumps the state law, and the Idaho law has to fall. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Scalia, J., thought Presidents were "officers of the United States" (Lawfare). [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:56 pm by Javier Dominguez
SuperValu Inc. et al., case number 21-1326, all before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 2:11 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Anna Bower (June 14, 2023) A Primer on the Silent Witness Rule and United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
  Selikoff entered Anderson’s College of Medicine, in Glasgow, Scotland.[13] 1936-12-28. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:59 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Natalie Orpett sat down with Saraphin Dhanani to discuss United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
The rest of the United States has two types of policies. [read post]