Search for: "Application of Andrews" Results 1 - 20 of 4,743
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2024, 5:23 am by Rob Robinson
Noteworthy publications this month include Andrew Haslam’s Q2 2024 eDisclosure Systems Buyers Guide, providing an in-depth examination of the industry’s current state and future trajectory. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:15 am by Charlie French (Bristows)
Nicoventures had made the document access request on 15 November 2023, however the Paris Central Division stayed its consideration of the application pending the Court of Appeal’s decision on the Rule 262.1(b) request in the Ocado v AutoStore proceedings, which was handed down on 10 April 2024 (UPC_CoA_404/2023 APL_584498/2023). [read post]
21 May 2024, 6:51 am by Dan Bressler
Courts have held that ‘lawful legal services to a fraudster does not impute knowledge of the fraud,’ said the firm’s counsel, lawyers from Hunton Andrews Kurth. [read post]
20 May 2024, 3:59 am by Greg Lambert
The hosts discuss the potential applications of agentic AI, such as quickly gathering information for client pitches or identifying legal issues. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
"  Deadline for Applications: June 30, 2024. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
During the 12 months since the UPC first opened its doors for business, court users across Europe have been studying the decisions that have been emerging from the various divisions in order to understand the practical application of the Rules of Procedure and the approach of the various judges of the courts. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Andrew Halpin (National University of Singapore (NUS) - Faculty of Law) has posted Overcoming von Wright’s Anxiety ((2024) 90 Theoria 191) on SSRN. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am by Eric Goldman
Andrews, 534 U.S. 19, 27 (2001) (Ginsburg, J.); and Justices Scalia and Thomas have criticized the expansive use of the discovery rule as a “bad wine of recent vintage,” id. at 37 (Scalia, J., concurring); Rotkiske v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:02 am by Dennis Crouch
Boston lawyer Michael Newman (Mintz) argued for the patentee Copan and was joined in the brief by Peter Cuomo, Andrew DeVoogd, Courtney Patrice Herndon, and James Wodarski. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 14 May 2024 there will be an application for security for costs in the case of Sikhs for Justice and another v Ranger KB-2022-004490 and a statement in open court in the case of Davies -v- BBC–KB-2024-000828. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:15 am by Josh Richman
She is the Assistive Technology Coordinator at the New York Public Library’s Andrew Heiskell Braille and Talking Book Library, where she founded and maintains the Dimensions Project, a free open lab for the exploration and creation of accessible images, models and data representations through tactile graphics, 3D models and nonvisual approaches to coding, CAD and “visual” arts. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
On April 25, the FTC accused Amazon of using the ephemeral messaging application Signal to purposefully delete relevant communications. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:34 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
Thus, the applicants have abandoned reasonable evidence of infringement for reasonable evidence of reproduction of a thing (which is allegedly covered by the Patent). [read post]