Search for: "Burlington Northern v. Fail" Results 1 - 20 of 75
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2023, 4:45 am by Eric B. Meyer
In 2006, the Supreme Court set the bar for retaliation in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
Superior Court (1997) 51 Cal.App.4th 1513 and may result in waivers of privilege per Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Ry Co. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:06 am by Joy Waltemath
As the Supreme Court noted in Burlington Northern, a reasonable employee facing the choice between retaining her paycheck and filing a discrimination complaint “might well choose the former” even if she eventually received back pay. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Supreme Court’s decision in the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, 129 S. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
., DC, 2d ed. 2000) The latest edition of the Manual attempts to correct the failings of the Second Edition by introducing an explanation and a discussion of some of the conditions that might undermine an inference, or opposition thereto, of specific causation from magnitude of relative risk. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:50 am by Nathaniel M. Glasser
  The court refused to decide whether that element requires a showing of “material adversity” – as articulated for Title VII claims in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:39 am by Nathaniel M. Glasser
  The court refused to decide whether that element requires a showing of “material adversity” – as articulated for Title VII claims in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]