Search for: "C. et al v. United Healthcare Insurance et al" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
This delay was largely influenced by the interests of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife) and other asbestos mining and product manufacturing companies. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
The Tax Foundation respectfully submits comment on the state tax and revenue implications of the proposed tobacco product standard for menthol in cigarettes. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:59 am by Robert Liles
Depending on the individual’s specific conduct, prosecutors have charged the defendants in this case with a variety of violations, ranging from conspiracy to commit insurance fraud to money laundering and identity theft. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 9:43 am by Ben Vernia
Sutter Health, et al., Case No. 15-CV-01062-JD (N.D. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
” See Brief for American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists et al. as Amici Curiae 6–10 (collecting studies and concluding “[a]bortion is one of the safest medical procedures performed in the United States”); Brief for Social Science Researchers as Amici Curiae 5–9 (compiling studies that show “[c]omplication rates from abortion are very low”).Many medical procedures, including childbirth,… [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am by Rachel Sachs
On Monday, the Court also heard argument in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:33 am by Kali Borkoski
Neeley v NameMedia Inc, et al (5:09-cv-05151)(11-2558) Is a fully briefed Eighth Circuit appeal that will be ignored by the United States Courts because of being pro se and IFP. [read post]