Search for: "CANFIELD v. CANFIELD"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2023, 6:42 am
” “‘The courts universally hold that a law firm will not be allowed to drop a client in order to resolve a direct conflict of interest, thereby turning a present client into a former client,’ MTTP argued, citing multiple court decisions such as Picker Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 4:37 pm
Madam Justice Horsman’s decision in Canfield v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 3:22 am
Rather, to establish an attorney-client relationship, there must be an explicit undertaking to perform a specific task” (Willoughby Rehabilitation & Health Care Ctr., LLC v Webster, 190 AD3d at 889; see Volpe v Canfield, 237 AD2d 282, 283). [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:47 am
Rather, to establish an attorney-client relationship, there must be an explicit undertaking to perform a specific task” (Willoughby Rehabilitation & Health Care Ctr., LLC v Webster, 190 AD3d at 889; see Volpe v Canfield, 237 AD2d 282, 283). [read post]
29 May 2022, 12:27 pm
In his view, this is best achieved through the established test in R v Collins, [1987] 1 SCR 265, 308. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:26 am
In the case of Canfield v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 7:48 am
Keeping an eye on his voluminous site of cites, I note several interesting updates: Current Client (posted July 15, 2020) Canfield v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 10:53 am
Canfield, 2015-Ohio-1323 (9th Dist.) [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:42 am
Canfield, 2015-Ohio-1323 (9th Dist.) [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:45 am
Canfield Co. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 6:30 pm
Marin, Marguerite V. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 1:16 pm
(Canfield v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm
May not be case by case but we have to figure out where and why to draw lines, some of which will be normative but not all.McKenna: surveys directed at words—Gucci v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 7:30 am
However, her Title VII claim against the Assistant Secretary of State in his official capacity, as well as her Section 1983 and state law claims, were dismissed because of Eleventh Amendment immunity (Canfield v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 6:01 am
Bryant v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:12 am
However, her Title VII claim against the Assistant Secretary of State in his official capacity, as well as her Section 1983 and state law claims, were dismissed because of Eleventh Amendment immunity (Canfield v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 6:49 am
Rick Kittel won in State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 6:10 am
’Zahorik v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 11:00 am
Chuck Casper, Pat Ryan, and Jennifer Canfield of Montgomery McCracken are co-counsel for Microsoft. [read post]
