Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 1 - 20
of 34,040
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2024, 10:11 am
It also brings to mind the Court's decision in California v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am
Only one court — a 2-1 panel of Ninth Circuit judges — ruled in the Trump Administration’s favor, but even that declined to find that the termination decisions complied with administrative law, holding instead only that the courts lacked jurisdiction to review them. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am
One way to get around spending 10 years in the US to overcome 212(a)(9)(B) inadmissibility is if the applicant is eligible for a waiver under INA §212(a)(b)(b)(v), which is based on a showing of extreme hardship to a qualifying relative such as a spouse or parent is a US citizen or lawful permanent resident. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
That paraphrasing of his decision in Schenck v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 12:22 pm
I was glad to see that the California Court of Appeal published its opinion in Luo v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 9:56 am
(See Bostock v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 7:36 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
See Olson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 3:04 pm
BUT THE DIFFERENCE IS THERE’S NOT A LOT OF COOL AIR TO PULL OFF OF FROM THE CALIFORNIA COAST. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 6:45 am
’ Coke v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:19 pm
The SCA further made two observations on the relevant provisions of California law. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:58 pm
This culminated with the California Supreme Court’s decision in Estrada v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 5:47 pm
All law students study Mapp v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 11:31 am
And California law categorically mandates that "The court shall order a person subject to a protective order issued pursuant to this section to relinquish any firearms" (as indeed happened in Adams v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:17 am
Second, California law allows for broad discovery of employee information from the outset of a PAGA case. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:04 am
Grindr Online Dating Services Must Give California Users a “Cooling Off” Period–Howell v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 7:45 am
Unanimous decision in Legislature of the State of California v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 2:41 pm
The TPA contains a plethora of other provisions as well, all designed to cover pretty much any possible way a statute (or law, or regulation, or municipal act, or whatever) could raise revenue or impose costs. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 2:24 pm
Second, California law allows for broad discovery of employee information from the outset of a PAGA case. [read post]