Search for: "Clark v. California Supreme Court" Results 1 - 20 of 379
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In the many cases (at the lower courts and the Supreme Court) upholding parts or all of regulations and court injunctions limiting protestor activity near clinic entrances and procedure rooms, noise has been one of the factors courts have held can be meaningfully taken into account by regulators because the noise itself interferes with a clinic’s function, and that harm must be considered alongside the interests of the protestors.CleanlinessAnother… [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm by Josh Blackman
The panel has also asked the NLRB to explain its actions in contacting the California District Court. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Reshaping American Life: Today’s Supreme Court in Historical Context, and its Potential Impact on our Future, a discussion/debate between Berkeley Law School Dean Erwin Chemerinsky and Case Western Reserve Law Professor Jonathan Adler, moderated by California Supreme Court Justice Carol Corrigan, will take place on Tuesday, April 23, 2024, 12:15 p.m. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 12:57 pm by Justia Team
Supreme Court case on our site this year with over 135,000 views. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
The Supreme Court’s Wetland Saga Continues July 13, 2023 | Monika U. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by INFORRM
Read the Supreme Court case summary here. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Act 689 is Not Narrowly Tailored The Court first considers the Supreme Court's narrow-tailoring analysis in Brown v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
The Supreme Court has explained that a State’s right to investigate suspected crimes justifies its questioning of suspects under oath and other aspects of an investigati [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm by Riann Winget
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”But if Tony Clark’s case is any indication, the Mississippi prosecutors and the state supreme court did not get the message. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
The First Amendment, though, doesn’t say anything either way about heckling.We find Professor Tushnet’s analysis here unconvincing, and unsupported by anything in Supreme Court case law. [read post]