Search for: "Cross v. Shell Oil Co"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2023, 1:02 pm
The Rhode Island government brought identical complaints in Shell Oil Products Company LLC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Supreme Court General Electric Co. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 5:36 am
Shell Oil Co., 2021 WL 1232694 (S.D. [read post]
26 May 2021, 4:09 pm
Chevron Texaco (09-15641); Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 133 S. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 11:31 am
Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337, 340 (1997)). [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm
”[1] Did Judge Milazzo engage in judicial dodging with rejecting the relevancy argument and emphasizing the truism that Sanofi could highlight the discrepancy on cross-examination? [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Royal Dutch Shell, 569 U.S. 108 (2013)).The Suit had been filed in 2017 (Ogoni 9 widow Esther Kiobel lands day in court against oil giant Shell). [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
The parties briefs can be viewed by following the hotlinks on the Texas Supreme Court’s docket for Hill v Shamoun.483 S.W.3d 767 (2016)SHAMOUN & NORMAN, LLP, Appellant and Cross-Appelleev.Albert G. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
The transition from shell to metal: beads fashioned from copper (dark) and from Spondylus (spiny oyster) shells (light). [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Hawkes Co., No. 15-290, 578 U.S. ____ (May 31, 2016). [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Hawkes Co., No. 15-290, 578 U.S. ____ (May 31, 2016). [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
Shell Oil Co., C. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 6:22 am
Supreme Court decision in Robinson v Shell Oil Co., wherein the court found that the term “employer” in Title VII encompassed former employers. [read post]
30 May 2014, 3:28 pm
Shell Oil Co.,890 F.Supp. 1324, 1375 (S.D. [read post]
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm
” The Oil Companies contracted to have McColl, a former Shell engineer, dump the waste at property in Fullerton, California. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:58 am
” The court noted that in Robinson v Shell Oil Co, the Supreme Court construed “employees” as defined in Title VII to include both current and former employees because the definition lacked a “temporal qualifier. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 10:26 am
Citing Rebel Oil Co. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:26 am
Citing Rebel Oil Co. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 12:30 am
Top stories today via @amendment4 @ajlbryant @genifergraff # Court Dismisses Data Breach Claims Against Countrywide – Holmes v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
Citing an earlier Supreme Court ATS case, Sosa v. [read post]
