Search for: "DAVID PURCELL" Results 1 - 20 of 66
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Over at Balkinization, an interesting symposium on David Pozen's The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024) has wrapped up. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:05 am by Yosi Yahoudai
In 2015, the JACL launched a campaign to see Endo honored posthumously, and renewed the call this year with a letter by JACL Executive Director David Inoue to President Biden. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In this regard, Jill Lepore’s fine discussion of Adkins should be compared to David Bernstein’s. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by JB
We have assembled a terrific group of commentators, including David Bernstein (George Mason), Stephen Breyer (SCOTUS/Harvard), James Fleming (BU), Ariela Gross (UCLA), William Forbath (Texas), Laura Kalman (UCSB), Jill Lepore (Harvard), Lisa McGirr (Harvard), William Novak (Michigan), Edward Purcell (New York Law School), Jeffrey Rosen (G.W. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
We don’t think there is a convincing answer to that question, which is one straightforward reason why we would be extremely surprised if this lawsuit ending up having any real legs.Follow @prof_amar Vikram David Amar is a Distinguished Professor of Law at UC Davis School of Law and a Professor of Law and Former De [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
[I]f so, and if no new districts are approved by the legislature and signed by the governor by date X, will the Supreme Court invoke the [so-called] Purcell rule [forbidding federal-court intervention in elections too close to Election Day] and say that the unconstitutional districts must be used for purposes of the 2024 election? [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
My argument is not, as David Schwartz  asserts, that Madison used the word interpose “incorrectly. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Contributors so far include Grace Mallon, David S. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by JB
We have assembled a terrific group of commentators, including Jessica Bulman-Pozen (Columbia), Mark Graber (Maryland), Alison LaCroix (Chicago), Sandy Levinson (Texas), Grace Mallon (Oxford), Edward Purcell (New York Law School), and David Schwartz (Wisconsin).At the conclusion, Chris will respond to the commentators. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 1:41 pm by Andrew Appel
“As set forth in the Declarations of Professor Appel, Susan Greenhalgh, Barbara Simons, and David Jefferson . . . there is a broad consensus within the scientific community that the return of ballots via the internet or by fax is not secure and creates a high-risk threat to the integrity of the election process and should not be used in voting now or in the foreseeable future. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
A decision from a Seattle area trial court sustained a challenge similar to the Utah challenge to an expert witness proffered by plaintiffs’ firm Brayton Purcell. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Surely it can’t be the rule that the Court cannot fix a Purcell error because doing so violates Purcell; if so, then lower courts could ignore Purcell with impunity.But we want to set aside Purcell, and its emphasis on remedial latitude, to examine a much more fundamental question: was there, to use the language we do above, “a strong and imminent likelihood of a federal violation (constitutional or statutory)” for the district judge in Wisconsin… [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:41 am by Adam Faderewski
Purcell, 90, of Bastrop, died January 28, 2019. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:41 am by Adam Faderewski
Purcell, 90, of Bastrop, died January 28, 2019. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
On the same day the Court of Appeal handed down judgment Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland ([2019] EWCA Civ 648 [£])(judgment not presently available on Bailii)(heard 25 to 26 July 2018): The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from a decision of Sir David Eady ([2018] EWHC 3368 (QB)). [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 1:31 pm by Derek T. Muller
Walker (Stanford 2006 / Kozinski), professor at Ohio StateJustice David H. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Richmond Holdings, LLC v David S. [read post]