Search for: "HALE v. RECORD."
Results 1 - 20
of 266
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 4:00 am
Hale was a 17th-century English legal scholar who was notoriously anti-woman (even by the standards of his time). [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm
Powe v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
It adds key facts to the historical record. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:25 am
From Mahmood v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 7:51 am
Dowling & Hales LLC. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
EPA’s record was mixed. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
" Among other heinous contributions, Hale is credited with furthering the legal rule that men cannot rape their wives and the practice of burning women at the stake when they are deemed (by men) to be witches.The citations in the draft opinion are staggering enough but, even after the world criticized Alito for including Hale in that draft, Hale still appeared in the final opinion in much the same manner. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 8:56 am
The Supreme Court’s cert grant last June in Moore v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 11:40 pm
I remember her as a witness who came across as trustworthy, knowledgeable, and fairly balanced in the FTC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
Erie Railroad v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:16 am
In June, the Supreme Court provided appellate judges with a neutron bomb against agency regulations with its decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:16 am
ColbIn Justice Alito's (SA's) leaked opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 10:19 am
The caption lists 8 BrandTotal lawyers, primarily from Husch Blackwell, and 11 Facebook lawyers from Wilmer Hale (plus at least 4 more from other firms), and they have marshaled some arcane/picayune arguments in an attempt to win at apparently any cost. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 2:03 pm
Hales, __ N.C. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 8:52 am
Hales, ___ N.C. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:53 pm
There is little section 1983 case law concerning inter-agency intervention, but the Fifth Circuit ruled in Hale v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 12:41 pm
(This latter was disposed of quickly on the basis that Lady Hale’s comments in Nzolameso v City of Westminster [2015] UKSC 22; [2015] HLR 2 on procurement policies were obiter reccomendations, rather than a requirement.) [read post]
