Search for: "In Re Marriage of Marshall" Results 1 - 20 of 141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
In the wake of the announced boycott against Columbia University, I posed several questions to Judge Matthew Solomson of the U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
" Additionally, Marshall married into a wealthy family who had rejected Jefferson (Marshall's wife's mother had declined a marriage proposal from Jefferson). [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm by Sasha Volokh
[Serial-blogging my recent article in the Notre Dame Law Review] On Monday, I started serial-blogging my article, The Myth of the Federal Private Nondelegation Doctrine, which has just come out in the Notre Dame Law Review. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am by David Pocklington
In our last roundup, we reported on the detailed judgment in Re St Michael le Belfrey York [2023] ECC Yor 2 handed down on 18 August. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm by Josh Blackman
' If you're not in the culture, you just don't know," Wildermuth said in an interview with CNN about the kinds of questions that came her way. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
The Biden Administration marshaled counter-radicalization policing—the preventative informant-driven surveillance program—as the centerpiece of its white supremacist counterterrorism strategy. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:06 am by Lana Ulrich
As Wurman and Fredrickson write, the Court concluded “that the law treated people differently based on race because it prohibited marriage based on the race of the other party to the marriage. [read post]
He created the organization with the encouragement and assistance of Paul Weyrich, a Melkite Greek Catholic and powerful conservative political strategist, who had established the Heritage Foundation in 1973.Throughout his career, Weyrich forcefully shaped the right-wing agenda that opposed abortion and same-sex marriage, and embraced the concept that Judeo-Christian beliefs are necessary for successful Western democracies. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:35 am by Frank Cranmer
Possible solutions could include the introduction of minimum standards regarding timetabling and resourcing to bring RE alongside other humanities subjects which would then be centrally inspected by Ofsted, the introduction of religious studies GCSE into the English Baccalaureate, or even outreach programmes to university graduates of theology and religious studies to ensure higher levels of faith literacy among RE teachers. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onFederation and Secession, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
 December 14, 2022Pendente lite child support award will not be disturbed absent exigent circumstances or failure to consider appropriate factors. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Brennan or Earl Warren, but, rather, John Marshall Harlan, who on notable occasions, including the reapportionment cases, dissented from quintessential “Warren Court” decisions. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
For example, if the other eight Justices are all in agreement, she might rethink (and re-rethink) her dissenting vote. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 4:36 am by Daniel Schwartz
  In 2008, we saw Connecticut legalize same sex marriages. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For that matter, Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor, as well as Justice Brown Jackson (while a federal judge), use those canons with increasing frequency in statutory interpretation cases as well.[17]Recognizing that fact, Justice Elena Kagan and a leading nontextualist scholar of statutory interpretation, Professor William Eskridge, have quipped, “[w]e’re all textualists now” (well, before walking that statement back in dissent to this past Term’s environmental… [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In an article in the Wisconsin Law Review, Keith A. [read post]