Search for: "In Re Richardson-Merrell, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Joiner had can cause small-cell lung cancer.[13] Perhaps the most egregious lapses in scholarship occur when Ranges, a newly minted scientist, and her co-author, a full professor of law, write: “For example, Bendectin, an antinausea medication prescribed to pregnant women, caused a slew of birth defects (hence its nickname ‘The Second Thalidomide’).49”[14] I had to re-read this sentence many times to make sure I was not hallucinating. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:00 pm
Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 584 A.2d 1383, 1386-87 (Pa. 1991); Baldino v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am by Bexis
Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 523 A.2d 374, 378 (Pa. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm by Bexis
Merrell Co., Division of Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 174 So.2d 736, 739 (Fla. 1965). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am by Schachtman
With the exception of a few evidence scholars, Federal Rule of Evidence 703 is ignored or misunderstood in practice. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:00 pm by Bexis
Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 727 F.2d 608 (6th Cir. 1984) (DES – back to UK); Lin v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 Obviously, if we’re calling California conservative and Idaho liberal, then the issues associated with comment k don’t fit well into the usual legal cubby holes.Idaho, then – holding our noses all the way. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm by Schachtman
Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 857 F.2d 823, 829 (D.C. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm by Bexis
RichardsonMerrell, Inc., 628 F. [read post]