Search for: "In re Graham, Petitioner"
Results 1 - 20
of 67
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 3:52 am
In any event Supreme Court dismisses on res judicata. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:26 am
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a forthcoming article in The George Washington Law Review, Carla L. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
There is some really interesting parts of the petition and case, but the petition largely re-argues the evidence — typically a losing approach at the Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm
Scott (1983) (same); see also Graham v. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 9:28 am
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
Lindsey Graham, Case 22-12696 (11th Cir. 2022), denial of application for stay and an injunction pending appeal by Supreme Court (Nov. 1, 2022). [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 2:33 am
Re St James Church Kirk [2022] ECC Bla 3 The Petitioner, the Senior Church Buildings Officer for the Diocese of Blackburn, proposed the removal of the eight bells from the redundant church of St James Church Kirk (“Church Kirk”) and their re-installation in the church of St. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
” WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a report, the U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
National/Federal 6 Lawmakers in 5 Days: New COVID-19 infections put spotlight on Congress’ loose guidelines USA Today – Christal Hayes | Published: 11/18/2020 As rampant nationwide coronavirus spikes force states to reexamine reopening efforts, Congress is still struggling to maneuver around the pandemic as it encroaches on legislative business and endangers its members. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
Three justices, in dissent, would have applied a bright-line bare metal defense, as contended for by petitioners.[4] The majority eschewed both the invariant bare metal defense and the Third Circuit’s infinitely flexible forseeability test, for a “third way. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 7:40 am
” See Graham v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
August 1, 2019Recent LegislationUnlawful dissemination or publication of an intimate image added to Family Court Act §812Laws of 2019, Ch 109 added the crime of unlawful dissemination or publication of an intimate image to the Penal Law as § 245.15 effective September 21, 2019. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 2:19 pm
Here, you’re asking us to split the baby, as it were. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:34 pm
Graham Phillips, the court-appointed amicus curiae arguing on behalf of the petitioner, has barely begun his argument before Katsas interjects. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 10:27 am
In re BaxterInt’l, Inc., 678 F.3d 1357, 1361 (Fed. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
Graham, 383 U. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
Lee Lockett, Jacksonville Beach, for Petitioner. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
Petitioner Shawn Wass seeks clarification of Missouri v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am
LeBlanc, 16-1177, concluding that Graham v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
If you like voting cases (if, say, your name is Rick), well, you’re in luck. [read post]
