Search for: "In re Woodworth"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
The Supreme Court articulated the meaning of materiality in cases in the 1970s and 1980s.[6] It is this standard of materiality that is reflected in Commission rules.[7] It is this same materiality standard that appears in numerous disclosure rules governing registration statements and public company annual reports.[8] It is this same materiality standard that is used throughout the final rules we’re considering today. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
For their work on these matters, I’d like to thank members of the SEC staff including: Haoxiang Zhu, Andrea Orr, David Saltiel, William Miller, Kyle Druding, Sharon Park, Roni Bergoffen, Eric Juzenas, Michael Coe, Michael Gaw, David Liu, Leah Mesfin, Michou Nguyen, Geoffrey Pemble, Justin Pica, Leah Drennan Will Magliocco, Carol McGee, John Guidroz, Israel Goodman, Matthew Lee, and Stephanie Park in the Division of Trading and Markets; Meridith Mitchell, Robert Teply, Leila Bham, Donna… [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
First, for example, as detailed in the release, the final rule was revised from the proposal to allow for more flexibility to offer preferential treatment through side letters so long as they’re disclosed and in some cases the preferential treatment is offered to all investors. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
First, for example, as detailed in the release, the final rule was revised from the proposal to allow for more flexibility to offer preferential treatment through side letters so long as they’re disclosed and in some cases the preferential treatment is offered to all investors. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
First, for example, as detailed in the release, the final rule was revised from the proposal to allow for more flexibility to offer preferential treatment through side letters so long as they’re disclosed and in some cases the preferential treatment is offered to all investors. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
” Thus, given how crypto trading platforms operate, many of them currently are exchanges, regardless of the reopening release we’re considering today. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Informed by public comment, and in light of current markets, we have updated and re-proposed these amendments. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Informed by public comment, and in light of current markets, we have updated and re-proposed these amendments. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Informed by public comment, and in light of current markets, we have updated and re-proposed these amendments. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 7:52 am
Woodworth observed that 4 and 6mg/kg doses had few side effects, and stated that the activity of daptomycin at the 6mg/kg dose would be expected to last 14-20 hours. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 10:29 pm
Cubist has not shown by a preponderance ofthe evidence that the Woodworth article was not enabling. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 1:11 pm
In Re Woodworth (Bankr. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 5:14 am
http://bit.ly/QOFhJK (Sarah Carter) Managing Mobile Risk - http://bit.ly/Qqud3Q (Sean Martin) Microsoft Re-releases RUs for Exchange 2007 and 2010 - http://bit.ly/QHGEtq (Casper Manes) Preemptive Strikes Against a Competitor’s Patent Application Preissuance Submissions (Part 2 of 2)http://bit.ly/RxlLUP (Martin Miller) Social Media Carries Regulatory Risk - http://bit.ly/RlZZDz (Taylor Provost) Social Media Upending Privacy in Real World… [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
In celebration of the 40th anniversary of the publication of its inaugural issue, Tax Notes is re-publishing memorable articles from its archives. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:06 am
" (In re Am. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 10:48 pm
They're experts. [read post]
24 May 2011, 4:58 am
If we’re not excited about that, what should we be excited about? [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:27 am
" (In re Am. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:15 pm
[Kate Moser] Today in court, lawyers from the S.F. police department’s legal division and the district attorney’s office looked as if they’re not on the same page. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:02 pm
Justice Sharon Woodworth ruled that the only evidence of any adverse effect is so trivial or minimal that it should not attract penal consequences. [read post]
