Search for: "In the Matter of Morrissey"
Results 1 - 20
of 141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2024, 3:47 am
Morrissey said in a statement. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 1:25 pm
Your business litigation matter deserves nothing less than the best in legal representation, and Lubin Austermuehle is here to deliver it. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 7:27 am
When the delegate already has inherent authority over the subject matter, the intelligible principle doctrine is weakened or dropped entirely. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
Morrissey-Berru (2020). [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 11:32 am
He's trying to implement the new charter foisted upon us by the arrogant children to whom the city turned the matter over, and there's no reason to suspect that Hizzoner won't screw that up like he has everything else he's handled over the last seven years.This week he and several of his colleagues on the City Council are scratching and hissing at each other over some of the petty details. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:44 am
Kaveny and her former firm Burke Wise Morrissey & Kaveny violated the act by redisclosing information pertaining to the plaintiff, identified in the current matter as John Doe, that was protected by Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
"[13] Nonetheless, it seems to me that there's a strong argument—as a First Amendment matter but even more so as a policy matter—in favor of some such limits on the political speech protection laws, when it comes to employees who speak on the employer's behalf to the public or to clients. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 3:30 am
Overall, however, there does not appear to be much correlation between Supreme Court appointments and its handling of employment law matters. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 10:10 pm
Morrissey-Berru (2020). [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 2:14 pm
Because the Supreme Court has instructed that "[w]hat matters, at bottom, is what an employee does"—and Markowski's actions alone make clear that she played a vital role in advancing the religious mission of BYU—her claim fails under the ministerial exception. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
As a practical matter, the distinction between rescheduling and relisting is great. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 9:05 am
Morrissey-Berru (2020), for the principle that "[t]he First Amendment protects the right of religious institutions 'to decide for themselves, free from state interference, matters of church government as well as those of faith and doctrine.'" … In Our Lady of Guadalupe School, the Supreme Court concluded that a form of immunity from employment-discrimination claims brought by certain employees, the ministerial exception, extended to two teachers who… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 12:37 pm
The Ruling is consistent with cumulative case law on the matter, including the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals’s decision in Morrissey v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
Morrissey-Berru overruled the Ninth Circuit’s decision that the teachers were teachers. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 11:58 am
Morrissey-Berru, 140 S. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm
But the court’s decision is not a final ruling on the matter, and it is not clear whether Trump will receive final numbers from the Census Bureau before he leaves office. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 5:45 pm
Morrissey-Berru, held that the “ministerial exception” under the religion clauses of the First Amendment which bars ministers from suing churches and other religious institutions for employment discrimination precluded cases filed by certain Catholic school teachers. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 3:38 pm
Morrissey-Berru, the Supreme Court expressed that in the First Amendment context, faith and education go hand in hand. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 2:16 pm
Morrissey-Berru upheld exemptions to the Americans with Disabilities Act and Age Discrimination in Employment Act for religious employees tasked with promoting church doctrine. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Quoting Morrissey-Berru’s reasoning, “What matters, at bottom, is what an employee does,” the court ruled that like other musical ministerial exception cases, Menard was clearly a minister.In a footnote, the court mentioned Menard’s argument that a harassment suit would not be barred by the exception. [read post]
