Search for: "Larsen v. Exclusive" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2019, 11:37 am by Eric Goldman
We can say with 100% confidence that mere adjacency doesn’t constitute trademark infringement (also see my expert report in Larsen v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 3:32 am by Edith Roberts
” Remember, we rely exclusively on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday, the court heard oral argument in Jennings v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:01 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion striking down Virginia’s exclusion of women from VMI, with Justice Scalia the lone dissenter. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 7:30 am by Jason Shinn
As we previously noted, this case raised a question of whether Michigan’s Whistleblowers’ Protection Act was the former employee’s exclusive remedy. [read post]
  Some statutes tie the exclusion to the pay level of a particular employee or the number of employees on the payroll or average payroll wages.[4]  Other exemptions apply only to casual or seasonal labor. [read post]