Search for: "MISTER v. THE STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 68
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2023, 1:57 pm by Elin Hofverberg
The decision to make Sweden Protestant was made during the state council (riksråd) in Västerås in 1527. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
” (Wolfe v Shawcor Ltd, 2016 ABQB 261) “It seems to me at this point this is somewhat parallel to the Pythonesque description of a particular parrot” (Karl Hermanns v. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 9:11 am by Benjamin Pollard
Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s decision in Egbert v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Stated otherwise, not only do compelled speech objections to directives about pronouns and titles largely sidestep the reality that courtrooms are already places of highly regulated speech, they are also taken up by some to disguise an underlying discriminatory ideology. [read post]
The minority opinion of Mister Justice Brown focusing on public policy would seem to be sounder.) [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
In addition to the populations of Bikini and   Enewetak, the people of Rongelap and Utirik were also affected by radioactive fallout from the largest nuclear test the United States has ever conducted, the Bravo test held March 1, 1954. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm by Erik J. Heels
On the patent side of the house, patent law is still in a state of (what I hope is) temporary insanity (at least I hope it’s temporary) about section 101 (patent subject matter) eligibility and the definition of “abstract idea” and other silly things. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 1:29 pm
Int’l Gourmet Rest. of Am., Inc., 838 F.2d 642, 646 (2d Cir. 1988); see also Mister Donut of Am., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:24 am
 The Republicans blame Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Jimmy Carter, Chuck Schumer, Barak Obama, North Korea, Chaing Kai-Shek, Julia Child, legalized Marijuana,  and Mister Rogers. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 9:07 am by Ron Coleman
Charbucks case (decision here, posted by Marty; the real name of the case is Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]