Search for: "Martin v. United Airlines, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” ““The doctrine of the ‘law of the case’ is a rule of practice, an articulation of sound policy that, when an issue is once judicially determined, that should be the end of the matter as far as Judges and courts of co-ordinate jurisdiction are concerned” (Erickson v Cross Ready Mix, Inc., 98 AD3d 717, 717 [2d Dept 2012]; Martin v City of Cohoes, 37 NY2d 162, 165 [1975]). [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit v Ontario Nurses’ Association, the Ontario Labour Relations Board did not consider a nurse who had been involved in pandemic planning as exercising managerial functions under the Labour Relations Act. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
In Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Jay
United Airlines (1989) 208 Cal.App.3d 71, 75.This point is particularly important in defamation claims because each new publication begins a new statute of limitations. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:22 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
United States Department of Health and Human Services & Kathleen Sebelius, here. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
COLA stated that the matter would be referred to COLA's Contract Fiscal Compliance Unit for a determination. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 4:59 pm
Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. [read post]