Search for: "Matter of Bowers v Bowers" Results 1 - 20 of 220
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2023, 3:30 am by Pat Gudridge
Ten years earlier the Court had decided in Bowers v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:46 am by Frank Cranmer
: on two significant decisions on the legal recognition of same-sex couples: Buhuceanu and Others v Romania and Maymulakhin and Markiv v Ukraine. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:55 am by INFORRM
The court ruled that the defense could apply even if the comment is based on false facts, as long as it is a matter of public interest and is honestly held. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
One of the things that originalists understand and that Vermeule seemingly doesn't is that a democratic constitution is supposed to be an exercise of popular sovereignty, and that has to matter for its role in present political life. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:25 pm by John A. Emmons
  In a continuation of their previous analysis of Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Gay and lesbian students, for instance, may understandably take personally speech that (say) proposes a rejection of same-sex marriage, a return to "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" in the military, or a return to Bowers v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
Texas, which found prohibitions on homosexual sex to be unconstitutional, the Court overruled its previous contrary holding in Bowers v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Pre-reflective intuitions and the views assumed by our actual practices are a good starting point for moral reasoning, but they are hardly the end of the matter. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 4:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
All that matters is whether the consent to settle was freely given. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Texas, the Court struck down a Texas law that made it a crime for gays and lesbians to have consensual sex in the privacy of their homes, overturning Bowers v. [read post]