Search for: "Matter of Finkelstein v Finkelstein"
Results 1 - 20
of 48
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2024, 4:12 am
That the matter was resolved by stipulation does not make a difference. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:55 am
Finkelstein (@COFinkelstein) and General (ret.) [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
, Best v. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:49 pm
” There seems to be only one relevant precedent: Televest v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 6:27 am
Smith v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:11 am
A motion to dismiss a complaint based on documentary evidence “may be appropriately granted only where the documentary evidence utterly refutes [the] plaintiff’s factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law” (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
8 May 2022, 8:57 am
For instance, in a 1998 seminal case on the matter Kass v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 3:28 am
A motion to dismiss a complaint based on documentary evidence “may be appropriately granted only where the documentary evidence utterly refutes [the] plaintiff’s factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law” (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:19 am
” The subject retainer, standing alone, failed to resolve conclusively all questions of fact regarding the scope of the CMM defendants’ representation as to the subject matter of the third cause of action (see Cali v Maio, 189 AD3d 1337, 1338; Shaya B. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
”) Schwab v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 7:51 am
Co. v Batista, 165 AD3d 997, 998; Doviak v Finkelstein &Partners, LLP, 90 AD3d 696, 699; Quinn v Walsh, 18 AD3d 638; Brill v Friends World Coll., 133 AD2d 729). [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 3:32 am
Co. v Batista, 165 AD3d 997, 998; Doviak v Finkelstein & Partners, LLP, 90 AD3d 696, 699; Quinn v Walsh, 18 AD3d 638; Brill v Friends World Coll., 133 AD2d 729). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
New York’s Position on Frozen Embryos and Divorce The most recent New York case dealing with frozen embryos and divorce is Finkelstein v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:18 am
In certain matters, a court may rely on the opinions of experts to fully and fairly determine the issues raised in litigation. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
”Jackson v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
__________ The Case Opinion:Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:34 am
Lubin, 122 F. 240 (1903).See Mazer v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:47 am
" However, the documentary evidence demonstrated that the plaintiff's individual liability on the notes was a matter outside of the scope of the defendants' representation of the plaintiff in her capacity as co-executor of the estate (see CPLR 3211[a][1]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435; DeNatale v Santangelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850). [*2]" [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 8:02 am
There is no dispute that Antilla included certain facts tending to support the short sellers’ story: Howard Finkelstein was a convicted felon who had, in fact, used the alias “Robert Howard,” see United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 9:14 am
Brock v. [read post]
