Search for: "Matter of Jeffrey A. Siegel"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2020, 10:08 am
Siegel added. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 1:59 pm
Siegel. [read post]
30 May 2019, 6:00 am
In 2011, Sixth Circuit Judge Jeffrey Sutton (during oral argument) and then-D.C. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 10:49 am
Both Jeffrey Sherrin (jsherrin@oalaw.com) and Jeffrey Siegel (jsiegel@oalaw.com) can be reached at (518) 462-5601. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:53 am
Jeffrey A. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:53 am
Jeffrey A. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 8:00 am
Siegel, Daniel J. and Pamela A. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:56 am
*Finally, I address what I call Judge Jeffrey Sutton’s “trilemma. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm
[Earlier posts in this symposium include contributions from: Robin Wilson, Bill Eskridge, Scott Michelman, Neil Siegel, and Suzanne Goldberg.] [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:30 pm
Siegel and Jeremy C. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:14 pm
“Thus, there is no reasonable basis to conclude that the trigger for priority is anything but the exercise of jurisdiction as was stated by the supreme court in Siegel. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:21 pm
“The court has long said that it doesn't matter what label Congress affixes to an exaction,” Siegel wrote Thursday in an NPR blog. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:18 pm
No matter, for it sought to commandeer the states. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
SIEGEL and CYNTHIA A. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 6:08 am
Lionel Loag (Jeffrey Rush) is the speech therapist. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
Why context matters: defining service animals under federal law. 37 Pepp. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
by Jeffrey ToobinMARCH 22, 2010Supreme Court Justices are remembered for their opinions, but they are revealed by their questions. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
Jonathan Siegel at PrawfsBlawg notes that Bilski v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
by Jeffrey Toobin Read more: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/03/22/100322fa_fact_toobin#ixzz0lIj2PqZC Supreme Court Justices are remembered for their opinions, but they are revealed by their questions. [read post]
