Search for: "Matter of Robert T" Results 1 - 20 of 10,445
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2024, 7:53 pm by Josh Blackman
Even after President Trump tried to rescind DACA, Chief Justice Roberts made up some convoluted test about reliance interests to ensure people could keep their deferred action and work authorization. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:41 am by sim1koh2
It does not matter what day or time it is, Shimon gets back to you. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
The High Court held that the claimant had no real prospect of establishing that the reviews caused, or were likely to cause, serious reputational harm, either as a matter of fact or by inference. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:05 pm by Josh Blackman
But, I don't think that Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kavanaugh wanted to embrace a repudiation of the Bruen tradition analysis—especially with Rahimi on the horizon. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:11 am by Eugene Volokh
And Justice Kavanaugh, joined by Chief Justice Roberts, tried as much as possible to abstain from this debate. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 7:17 am by Will Yeatman
(As a related aside, I discussed this matter some years ago on this blog). [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 8:58 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
The practicality I’ve noticed over the years is that no matter what we aim at, there’s the very severe, shorter-term FDA trial. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 4:41 am by SHG
No matter how deeply the left hates Alito and Thomas, the reality remains that Chief Justice Roberts can’t force them to do anything. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:50 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
The articles about the book that I have read have, predictably, focused on Judge Tatel’s criticism of the Roberts Court. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 4:20 am by sim1koh2
It does not matter what day or time it is, Shimon gets back to you. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
As a matter of numbers, the exodus is not history-making. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
“[T]he most obvious way” to ensure that the award motivated Musk to focus on Tesla, the court explained, “would have been a requirement that Musk devote substantially all his professional time and attention to Tesla-related matters,” but “no one proposed anything like that to Musk. [read post]