Search for: "Minor v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 16,206
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm
“[I]nferring bad faith based on the racial effects of a political gerrymander in a jurisdiction in which race and partisan preference are very closely correlated” would, Alito suggested, allow litigants and courts to circumvent the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Rucho v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 4:12 am
Johnson v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:33 pm
., Appellants, v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:23 am
Under the ICC’s founding principle of complementarity, a case is “inadmissible” if it is being “investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution” (Rome Statute art. 17(1)(a)). [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am
In other words, Alito is who he always was, and the "Concerned Alumni of Princeton," with their focus on white-male success, was a perfect fit for him.2) When the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am
Under Illinois v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:05 pm
The Ninth Circuit, in U.S. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
What we learned is that the Jewish students are under assault in a way that far exceeds what would be tolerated against any other minority group, but shouldn't be tolerated against anybody. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” The Supreme Court held in International Union, UAW v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am
Criminal Law: Language RightsR. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:37 pm
Brown v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:00 am
Muldrow v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:36 am
In In Re Jackson, Judge Leval applied this approach to a right of publicity claim, but it is applicable to any state law cause of action, and in X v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:00 am
That was the argument before the Florida Supreme Court in the case of Malicki v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:46 am
TVA v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
Earlier this year, the Fourth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:41 am
” “The Supreme Court held that the majority-of-the-minority stockholder vote approving the transaction was not fully informed, based on inadequate disclosure of conflicts of interest on the part of financial advisors to the special committee of Inovalon’s board. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:50 am
In their Complaint, two minority shareholders of Dial, suing derivatively on behalf of the company, named seven of Dial’s board members and officers as defendants alleging claims for Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Dissolution (no particular statute specified), Accounting, Declaratory Judgment, Conversion, Unjust Enrichment, Constructive Trust, and Injunction. [read post]
