Search for: "PFIZER INTERNATIONAL INC., LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm
Kan Di Ki LLC, the U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Pfizer was a major contributor to the level of healthcare M&A, announcing a number of deals, including its $11.6 acquisition of Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, $5.4 billion acquisition of Global Blood Therapeutics and $525 million acquisition of ReViral. [read post]
23 May 2022, 1:00 am
On Wednesday 25th May, the Court will hand down judgment in Competition and Markets Authority v Flynn Pharma Ltd and Pfizer Inc [2022] USKC 14, on appeal from [2020] EWCA Civ 617. [read post]
16 May 2022, 3:01 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 18/5/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
9 May 2022, 3:45 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 11/5/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 5:25 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 27/4/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:43 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 28/3/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Secretary of State for the… [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:14 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 23/3/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Secretary of State for… [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 2:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 16/3/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 4:23 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 09/03/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong,… [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 2:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 02/03/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar… [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:16 am
On Tuesday 22nd February, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Competition and Markets Authority v Pfizer Inc and Flynn Pharma Ltd, on appeal from [2020] EWCA 617. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 6:59 am
In Biogen International GmbH v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:57 pm
” Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm
Twelve Lots of CHANTIX® (Varenicline) Tablets have been recalled by Pfizer due to N-Nitroso Varenicline content above ADI level. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Pfizer Canada Inc., 2018 FC 443, reversed 2018 FC 956 – The Prothonotary denied a motion on consent for issuance of a protective order on a similar basis as in Live Face on Web. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:14 am
., LLC v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 5:10 pm
In addition, the drug manufacturer Pfizer paid approximately $23.85 million to resolve claims that it used a foundation as a conduit to pay the co-pays of Medicare patients taking Pfizer drugs. [read post]
1 May 2018, 12:25 pm
Pfizer Pharms., LLC, 730 F.3d 49, 54 (1st Cir. 2013) (“USERRA’s provisions should be broadly construed in favor of military service members as its purpose is to protect such members”) (internal quotations omitted); Jbari v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
Pfizer Canada Inc. 2017 FC 826, the Federal Court said that the funding agreement is privileged and refused to order disclosure of the complete unredacted agreement to the defendant. [read post]
