Search for: "People v. Read (1983)" Results 1 - 20 of 745
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 8:15 am by David Pocklington
The new wording in s.8 of the 2022 Act was inserted into the main piece of legislation, as s.114A Representation of the People Act 1983, which sets out the activities that fall within the offence. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[27] Other unusual vehicles for E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks have included unpasteurized juices, yogurt, dried salami, mayonnaise, raw milk, game meats, sprouts, and raw cookie dough.[28] According to a recent study, an estimated 93,094 illnesses are due to domestically acquired E. coli O157:H7 each year in the United… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
§1983 (“section 1983”),[4] and, for that matter, the Fourteenth Amendment’s “state action” requirement.[5] The Court framed the issue before it as a choice between two competing standards. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 11:54 pm by Aaron Moss
The Bottom Line While the Ninth Circuit has touted the value of expert witnesses in several of its recent (albeit unpublished) opinions, Yonay v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am by David Pocklington
Nicholas Leicester [2024] ECC Lei 2 This judgment (which was preceded by three interim judgments with the neutral citations [2023] ECC Lei 1, [2023] ECC Lei 2 and [2023] ECC Lei 3, dealing with preliminary issues) relates to a petition for the introduction of a new altar frontal displaying the colours of the Progress Pride flag, the church having come to be regarded over time as a safe worshipping space for LGBTQIA+ people of faith. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Rachel Kleinfeld
Supreme Court had taken on new powers (in their case, the power of constitutional review) in the 1803 case, Marbury v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Then, too, he was afraid people would read his work as a commentary on the Warren Court. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]