Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 1 - 20 of 6,088
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, in a draft opinion obtained and published this week by Politico, detailed his justifications for overturning Roe v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am by Phil Dixon
An eyewitness reported that one of the people involved was a dreadlocked Black man. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am by Tom Dannenbaum
(Editor’s Note: This article is part of our new symposium on the ICC and Israel-Hamas war.) [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Defendant cross-moved for summary judgment seeking declaratory judgment in its favor on the constitutionality of Executive Law § 94. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Defendant cross-moved for summary judgment seeking declaratory judgment in its favor on the constitutionality of Executive Law § 94. [read post]
11 May 2024, 6:56 am
 It is possible to identify three areas of current interest in relation to the control of cognition to advance the interests and aspiration of ideologically driven human collectives. [read post]
10 May 2024, 10:45 am by Unknown
Reception and integration of displaced people from Ukraine (European Parliament, April 2024) [text] Safe Homes: Lessons learnt from private hosting initiatives for people fleeing Ukraine (European Commission, April 2024) [text] - See also related Red Cross EU report. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am by Adam Klasfeld
” At its core, Weinstein’s case simply applied the long-established rules of the more than century-old case of People v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am by Mutasim Ali
Second, based on the first conclusion, and as established by the ICJ in Bosnia v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am by centerforartlaw
In addition, most of the cultural goods looted during World War II crossed multiple borders. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[42] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In Part One, we laid out the larger First Amendment framework in which the dispute might be located and discussed how the Court’s language and reasoning in Hazelwood School District v. [read post]