Search for: "Peter v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 5,660
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2024, 5:00 am by Francion Brooks (Bristows)
Indeed, he had shortly before accepted some similar arguments in refusing an application for a declaration that a particular form of interim licence agreement would be FRAND in Lenovo v InterDigital ((2024] EWHC 596 (Ch)). [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
 LooperLegal Usage: A Modern Style Guide (2018) by Peter ButtLegal Writing: A Judge’s Perspective on the Science and Rhetoric of the Written Word (2020) by Ho [read post]
26 May 2024, 7:49 pm by Béligh Elbalti
The Ruling   The BSC rejected the appeal by ruling as follows: “It stems from the text of the provisions of Articles 1, 2 and 7 of the [1995 GCC Convention on the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments] as ratified by Bahrain in [1996], and the established practice of this Court, that judgments of a GCC Member State rendered in civil, commercial, administrative matters as well as personal status matters that become final [in the State of origin] shall be enforced by the… [read post]
25 May 2024, 4:53 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
  The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in Lear Siegler, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:15 am by Charlie French (Bristows)
Although the Court of Appeal stated in Ocado v AutoStore that the interest of the general public usually arises after a decision is rendered, the position was different in this case as it might be too late for Nicoventures to use the information in the EPO proceedings if access was not granted immediately. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:45 am by Rebecca Daramola (Bristows)
It stated that the documents of the EPO examination proceedings cited by the parties shed no new light on its interpretation. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:30 pm by Jesse Peters
In line with previous case law such as In ‘t Veld v Council, the Court required [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
  This is nicely illustrated by three decisions, one from the Helsinki local division in AIM Sport v Supponor (UPC CFI_214/2023), one from the Munich Local Division in 10x Genomics v NanoString (UPC CFI_17/2023) and a recent decision of the Paris Central Division in Nokia v Mala Technologies, (UPC_CFI_484/2023). [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:41 am by Dan Bressler
In most states, a lawyer may share court-awarded fees with a nonprofit organization that employed, retained or recommended the lawyer’s employment. [read post]