Search for: "Robinson v. Day, et al" Results 1 - 20 of 84
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
The ABA Business Law Section Backgrounder may be accessed HERE. 1UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMANORTHEASTERN DIVISIONNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS )UNITED, d/b/a the NATIONAL )SMALL BUSINESS )ASSOCIATION, et al., ))Plaintiffs, ))v. ) Case No. 5:22-cv-1448-LCB)JANET YELLEN, in her official )capacity as Secretary of the )Treasury, et al., ))Defendants. )MEMORANDUM OPINIONThe late Justice Antonin Scalia once remarked that federal judges… [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
In § 6, I discuss an important recent study by Kimberly Rauscher ScD, MA, et al. , entitled “Prevalence of Workplace Violence Against Young Workers in the United States,” published in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine , Volume 66, Issue 6 [pp. 462-471]. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:20 am by Joseph L. Hyde
LaFave et al., Search & Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 2.1(e) (6th ed. 2020). [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(Weir) and Weir & Associates (Weir Associates), stemming from their alleged failure to file a timely notice of claim concerning a pending action commenced by plaintiff in Supreme Court, New York County, entitled Siegel v City of New York, et al., Index No. 156682/2018 (the pending action). [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:09 am by Bill Marler
HAV may cause no symptoms at all when it is contracted, especially in children.[24] Asymptomatic individuals will only know they were infected (and have become immune, given that you can only get HAV once) by getting a blood test later in life.[25] Approximately 10 to 12 days after exposure, HAV is present in blood and is excreted via the biliary system into the feces.[26] Although the virus is present in the blood, its concentration is much higher in feces.[27] HAV… [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 8:35 am by dferriero
  Treaty between the United States and the Comanche, Aionai (Hainai), Anadarko, Caddo, et al., Signed at Council Springs, Robinson County, Texas, near the Brazos River, May 15, 1846. https://catalog.archives.gov/id/175516196  Senate’s Advice and Consent to Treaty Ratification with Amendments, February 15, 1847. https://catalog.archives.gov/id/175516197  Instrument of Ratification Signed by President James K. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 8:09 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” See 5 Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal Practice and Procedure § 1278 (3d ed. 2021) (quoting Dynasty Apparel Indus. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm by Schachtman
Richard Seeborg, held hearings with four days of viva voce testimony from four of plaintiffs’ expert witnesses (two on biological plausibility, and two on epidemiology), and three of the defense’s experts. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:00 am by Wolfgang Demino
District Court with subject matter jurisdiction.INDIA SAMONE KAHCLAMAT, Plaintiff,v.WILLIAM NASH, ET AL., Defendants.No. 3:18-cv-464-G-BN.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]