Search for: "SHARKEY v. SHARKEY"
Results 1 - 20
of 93
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 4:13 am
The abstract provides: In Loomis v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 5:29 pm
While the Court of Appeal in John v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co v Campbell (2003): The Misguided Legacy of ProportionalityCatherine M Sharkey (New York University, USA)14. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight our top regulatory essays of 2023 authored by a select number of our many expert contributors. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
Sharkey and Jeffrey Edward Green. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Pix credit here For those of you who have been following my step by step encounter with Jan Broekman's path-breaking book, Knowledge in Change: The Semiotics of Cognition and Conversation (Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature, 2023), I am happy to announce that the entire work is now ready for review as a discussion draft.The abstract described my intentions: Humans create but do not regulate generative systems of data based programs (so-called… [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
See, Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 3:57 am
In Sharkey v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 3:30 am
Ellen Bublick More than a hundred years ago, in Mitchell v. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm
Beale v. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 6:22 am
Catherine Sharkey, who is Crystal Eastman Professor of Law at New York University School of Law, has written a thought-provoking, and in light of the recent Supreme Court of Ohio decision in Stiner v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:00 am
A central thesis of this chapter is that it is questionable whether the reasoning of Dixon J in the Cold War Era cases (Sharkey, Burns v Ransley, Communisty Party Case, and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Case) as well as the reasoning in subsequent pivotal executive power cases in the High Court such as AAP and Davis, support the development of an inherent executive “nationhood” power in s 61 of the Constitution. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court’s latest foray into this area is Merck v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 12:34 pm
Sharkey, according to a press release today from ADF. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 12:33 pm
Co. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 12:33 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 8:19 am
Barbara Munroe-Diamond, Sally Sharkey, James P. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Ratio Christi at the University of Colorado v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:15 am
The record in the case, E.D. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 2:57 pm
” Sharkey v. [read post]
