Search for: "STRYKER v. THE STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 261
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2020, 9:03 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Stryker Corp., 755 F.3d 1367, 1373 (Fed. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am by Dennis Crouch
LSI Corporation, No. 19-337 (state sovereign immunity against IPR challenge) Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 9:02 am by Dennis Crouch
Stryker Corporation, No. 18-1549 (is negligence enough for enhanced damages). [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 6:18 am by Dennis Crouch
United States Postal Service, et al. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 7:57 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Tejas Narechania's new paper, Certiorari, Universality, and a Patent Puzzle, forthcoming in Michigan Law Review argues that a major identifying factor for the Supreme Court's interest in patent cases is a field split: an area where a particular patent law doctrine plays out differently in patent law than in other fields of law where it is used. [read post]
30 May 2017, 7:02 am by Joy Waltemath
The domicile of the parties also did not favor one state over the other since Stryker was based in Michigan, and the sales rep was domiciled in Louisiana. [read post]