Search for: "State v. Sensing" Results 1 - 20 of 20,824
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 1:07 pm by Stephen E. Sachs
This Clause likely protects a variety of preexisting rights defined by general law—rights that we today might call common-law rights, but not in the sense of being up to state or federal judges to invent. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
Beyond the law in the organic-material sense and formal regulations, there is, as is well known, a multitude of norma-tive instruments that should not be neglected. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:41 am by Dan Bressler
Lucian Pera writes on: “The Madness of the Lawyer Fee-Sharing Ban” — “To begin to test that premise, consider with me this question: Does today’s law on what is, and is not, prohibited as fee-sharing with nonlawyers make sense? [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Meade J disagreed; the invention did not require choosing individual sets of detailed conditions and therefore the claims were not about “relevant ranges” in the Illumina sense. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:42 am by Richard Hunt
” The “worse experience” part of this sentence doesn’t make sense. [read post]