Search for: "U. S. v. Gould"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
The Supreme Court’s Wetland Saga Continues July 13, 2023 | Monika U. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm
The contributors to this series are: Robin Kundis Craig, USC Gould School of Law; Monika U. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:27 am
U. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Gould v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am
S. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm
” In contrast, the agency’s previously released strategic plan had described the agency’s mission as promoting “competition” for the benefit of consumers, consistent with the case law’s commitment to protecting consumer welfare, dating at least to the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Reiter v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm
In the case of Gould v Jordan (No.2) [2021] FCA 1289 White J held that the impugned statements referred to the plaintiff and conveyed defamatory imputations but that they were made on an occasion of qualified privilege. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 5:00 am
(See Crawford v Himmelstein, 2011 WL 2552326 [Sup Ct, NY County 2011], citing Wexler v Shea & Gould, 211 AD2d 450 [1st Dept 1995].) [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am
Today’s second argument is in Opati v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
This is amply demonstrated by Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. v Pollack 2019 NY Slip Op 50793(U) Decided on May 17, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Reed, J.. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 3:40 am
Justicebacker Inc. v Abeles 2019 NY Slip Op 30294(U) February 7, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 650374/2017 Judge: David Benjamin Cohen is an example of how this might work. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 3:49 am
That’s the interesting question addressed not for the first time by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Marcy Friedman in Quazzo v 9 Charlton Street Corp., 2019 NY Slip Op 30097(U) [Sup Ct NY County Jan. 10, 2019]. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:27 am
Getting the Asian authorities also to reverse their positions in IP policy, for example, on antitrust enforcement, is a daunting task.US U-turnsIn a major reversal to the stance of Renate Hesse, the former head of the DoJ’s Antitrust Division, her successor Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust Makan Delrahim really hit the nail on the head in his speech at the USC Gould School of Law's Center for Transnational Law and Business Conference in Los… [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:28 am
The third time definitely wasn’t a charm for the plaintiff in Austin v Gould, 2017 NY Slip Op 31494(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 13, 2017], in which the court dismissed ill-pleaded claims for “unfettered and unlimited access to all books and records” of a series of Delaware limited liability companies and their wholly-owned real estate subsidiaries. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 3:16 am
Justice Platkin’s valuation ruling last month in Matter of Digeser v Flach [Gould Erectors & Rigging, Inc.], 2017 NY Slip Op 50220(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Jan. 31, 2017], is the culmination of an oppressed minority shareholder dissolution petition filed in April 2013. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 3:33 am
An earlier post on this blog, examining a post-trial decision in Matter of Digeser v Flach, 2015 NY Slip Op 51609(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Nov. 5, 2015], described the minority shareholder’s dissolution claim under Section 1104-a of the Business Corporation Law as a “classic case of minority shareholder oppression. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm
City U. [read post]
