Search for: "U. S. v. Taylor"
Results 1 - 20
of 194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2018, 3:01 pm
S. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 3:01 pm
S. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 7:52 am
See Taylor v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 9:14 am
LLC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 11:28 pm
Taylor Wessing France, 2008 NY Slip Op. 51885(U) (Sup. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:09 am
In Mathis v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Collective bargaining under the Taylor Law: submitting demands characterized as new or regressive after post-impasse fact-findingBuffalo Teachers Federation v Buffalo City School District, PERB U-34445Buffalo City School District v Buffalo Teachers Federation, PERB U-34462 On July 21, 2015, The Buffalo Teachers Federation [BTF] filed an improper practice charge with the New York Public Employment Relations Board [PERB]. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 7:55 am
S. 225, 230 (1964); see also Kellogg Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 10:41 am
SORNA Sentencing; tiers [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 2:00 am
U.S., 481 U. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 4:36 am
Activities by teachers in the course of collective bargaining are not protected activities within the meaning of the Taylor Law when such activities place students at riskLucia v Board of Educ. of the E. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
Taylor, 303 U. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 4:15 am
Dismissal during an employee's disciplinary probationary periodMatter of Bradford v New York City Dept. of Correction, 2006 NY Slip Op 30569(U), July 11, 2006, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 111044/05, Judge: Debra A. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:49 am
Union can require non-members to contribute to union’s legal feesLocke et al. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 1:59 am
S. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
Court of Appeal Rules Facebook’s Fine Print Trumps Privacy Law http://t.co/7SmkSxPaNo -> [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 6:39 am
James School v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
" The Court of Appeals then noted that it "answered that question in the affirmative five years later" in Matter of City of Watertown v State of New York Public Employment Relations Board, 95 NY2d 73 [Watertown], holding that "the procedures for contesting the City's determinations under section 207-c are a mandatory subject of bargaining. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
" The Court of Appeals then noted that it "answered that question in the affirmative five years later" in Matter of City of Watertown v State of New York Public Employment Relations Board, 95 NY2d 73 [Watertown], holding that "the procedures for contesting the City's determinations under section 207-c are a mandatory subject of bargaining. [read post]
