Search for: "United States v. Choice" Results 1 - 20 of 7,184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Michael Oykhman
This choice will impact the severity of punishments that you are given, with indictment being the more severe of the two. [read post]
  On Tuesday I attended a hearing called by the US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions to examine women’s freedoms, focusing on access to abortions across the United States two years after the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
Banks also recently wrote an essay for Stanford Lawyer about the unanimous decision, which held that state-mandated segregation of public schools violated the 14th amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
30 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On May 23, 2024, the United States Supreme Court unanimously held in Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 9:12 pm
  Eric Feigin, arguing for the United States as amicus, appeared to acknowledge this point when he said that there is a “chicken-and-egg problem,” because expert opinions will be aware of the Court’s decisions. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am by INFORRM
They have been brought or taken to the UK by the choices of adults directing then. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:05 pm by Josh Blackman
In 2016, South Carolina reelected Republican Tim Scott to the United States Senate; Scott is the first black senator from the South since Reconstruction. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
In other words, Alito is who he always was, and the "Concerned Alumni of Princeton," with their focus on white-male success, was a perfect fit for him.2) When the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been… [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:07 pm by Stephen E. Sachs
In particular, we have to distinguish specific questions of original meaning from more general—and, here, more relevant—questions of original law: that is, the law of the United States as it stood at the Founding, and as it's been lawfully changed to the present day. [read post]