Search for: "United States v. Craig Miller" Results 1 - 20 of 66
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Paul Miller, founding partner at Miller/Wenhold Capitol Strategies, takes issue with tying lobbyists to the Menendez case, which centers on alleged bribery by businesspeople who are not registered lobbyists. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am by Guest Author
  A few years after deciding Pennsylvania Coal, the Supreme Court returned to regulatory takings with Miller v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
The Defendants in Craig McLachlan’s defamation case have alleged that the actor touched a colleague’s breast during a rehearsal for Neighbours in the 1980s during a preliminary hearing. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
United States The US songwriter Phoebe Bridgers is being sued for defamation by producer Chris Nelson, who claims she “intentionally used her high-profile public platform on Instagram to publish false and defamatory statements regarding [Nelson] in order to destroy his reputation. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
United States   Research and Resources Privacy by Default, Abuse by Design: EU Competition Concerns About Apple’s New App Tracking Policy, Hausfeld Competition Bulletin, Spring 2021, Thomas Hoppner and Philipp Westerhoff, Technical University Wildau and Hausfeld RA LLP. [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
United States In the case of Hedine v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 5:01 am by Russell Spivak
As I’ve written previously on Lawfare, in that case: The court analyzed the law under the framework of intermediate scrutiny established under Craig v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 8:47 am by Kristian Soltes
The capability is rolling out in the United States and 27 other global markets, PayPal says, and will be free to start with. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:32 pm by Mark Walsh
Ginsburg ponders the issue at hand (Art Lien) Ginsburg gets a laugh when she asks Rikelman a friendly question about Craig v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
  However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:29 am by Patricia Hughes
This approach is more in keeping with the presidential system in, for example, the United States, and not consistent with the Westminster form of government, in which an election can occur at any time, with the approval of the Governor General. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:32 am by neli
 On that front, this year’s biggest news is our new edition of the United States Constitution Annotated (CONAN), a comprehensive explanation of the United States Constitution and of the key Supreme Court cases that interpret it. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]