Search for: "Washington v. General Elec. Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
In the face of this traditional judicial lassitude, “[v]igorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof” were all a litigant could hope to accomplish in litigation. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
Most judges were clearly much more comfortable with proxies of validity, such as qualification, publication, peer review, and general acceptance. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Green, “Reference Guide on Epidemiology,” in Federal Judicial Center, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence 123, 150, 168 (Washington, DC:, 1st ed., 1994) (“The relative risk from an epidemiological study can be adapted to this 50% plus standard to yield a probability or likelihood that an agent caused an individual’s disease. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Everest Minerals Corp., 362 F. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:43 pm by Christa Culver
Circuit's decision conflicts with this Court's decision in Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. [read post]