Search for: "Watkins v. Watkins (1983)"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2010, 2:14 am
Watkins v Woolas [2010] EWHC 2702 (QB); [2010] WLR (D) 288 “S 106 of the Representation of the People Act 1983, which imposed the penalties for an election candidate found guilty of a corrupt or illegal practice, was compatible with the right to freedom of expression contained in art 10 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:58 pm
The Sixth Circuit’s recent decision in Watkins v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:58 pm
The Sixth Circuit’s recent decision in Watkins v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 1:20 pm
See Solem v. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
Watkins Law & Advocacy, PLLC v. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
Watkins Law & Advocacy, PLLC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:49 pm
” Wells v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 1:59 pm
On Sloan’s heels, the Northern District of Ohio addressed the same issues in Watkins v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 9:51 am
" Utah v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:14 am
Balthasar v Mullane was followed by the Court of Appeal again in Adams v Watkins (1990) 22 H.L.R. 107. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 11:39 am
In 2005, the US Supreme Court in Roper v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 6:30 am
Court Rules, comment 4 on R. 4:37-2 (2010) (citing Watkins v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 10:16 am
” Watkins v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:55 am
Watkins, 11 F.3d 1573, 1577–78 (Fed. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:18 pm
The case which has most recently looked at section 106 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (RPA) is Watkins v Woolas ([2010] EWHC 2702(QB)). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 8:46 am
Watkins, 21 La. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:16 am
Two of these defendants—Jessica Watkins and Roberto Minuta—were charged with “impeding” officers during a civil disorder, a charge that carries a maximum five-year term as compared to the maximum 20-year term for assaulting officers with a dangerous weapon. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
§ 1983. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
The Opinion did not otherwise deal with the well-reasoneddecision by Judge Watkins in the District Court and, putting aside the statute of limitation issue,left intact his findings that Mr. [read post]
