Search for: "Whiting v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 7,051
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2024, 9:12 pm
  Eric Feigin, arguing for the United States as amicus, appeared to acknowledge this point when he said that there is a “chicken-and-egg problem,” because expert opinions will be aware of the Court’s decisions. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
In other words, Alito is who he always was, and the "Concerned Alumni of Princeton," with their focus on white-male success, was a perfect fit for him.2) When the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:07 pm by David Pozen
The dispute concerns the meaning of the statutory phrase “currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
  Justifying Hamas's murderous pogrom by saying Israel deserved what it got is nothing less than supporting a terrorist organization – the same as blaming the United States for 9/11. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:51 am by Dennis Crouch
The Court disagreed, ruling that “an authorized sale outside the United States, just as one within the United States, exhausts all rights under the Patent Act. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Bass and Jonathan Glater of counsel), for The New York City Bar Association, amicus curiae.Moulton, J.The New York City public school system is the largest in the United States. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Bass and Jonathan Glater of counsel), for The New York City Bar Association, amicus curiae.Moulton, J.The New York City public school system is the largest in the United States. [read post]