Search for: "Baker v. U.S. District Court" Results 181 - 200 of 772
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2019, 9:56 am by Lev Sugarman
Pildes analyzed the 1983 Supreme Court decision in INS v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: Subscript offers a graphic explainer for U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The topic of malapportionment is well-trodden ground, with established measures borne both of legal necessity following Baker v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:52 am by Sheppard Mullin
District Court for the Western District of Texas, Louis Vuitton sued the Eisenhauer Road Flea Market, its owner, Bruce L. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 4:01 am
Likewise, in denying standing to a passenger in a rented truck, a district court in the Western District of Pennsylvania concluded that the passenger was not an authorized driver, and, moreover, there was no evidence that he had ever driven the truck or had the authorized driver's permission to do so. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:12 am by Will Aitchison
Gangi, 328 U.S. 108, 114-16(1946)); accord Howell v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 5:01 am by Garrett Hinck, Matthew Kahn
A Maryland district court issued a preliminary injunction stopping the implementation of the most recent travel ban. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 4:56 am by Vishnu Kannan
District Court for the Northern District of California decision to issue a preliminary injunction in East Bay Sanctuary et al. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The district court granted the request for expert witness fees, but denied the personnel expense request finding that the phrase “all the expenses of the proceedings” was not specific and explicit to include such expenses due to the presumption under the “American Rule” that litigants pay their own attorneys’ fees (quoting Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:16 am by Lev Sugarman
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 7:04 am by Vishnu Kannan
District Court for the District of Columbia’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]