Search for: "Barrett Co. v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2020, 10:45 am
The two phrases—“officers of the United States” and “office under the United States”—are seen as co-extensive. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 11:09 am
Indeed, in Myers v. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The PROMESA Board Members Are Not "Officers of the United States." So What Are They?
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, the Supreme Court decided Financial Oversight and Management Bd. for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:17 pm
Maryland could help decide the Faithless Electors Cases] [This post was co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Last week, we posed three questions concerning the characterization of presidential electors. [read post]
18 May 2020, 11:30 am
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Last week, the en banc Fourth Circuit decided two related cases in the Foreign Emoluments Clause litigation. [read post]
15 May 2020, 4:30 am
[Co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in two faithless elector cases. [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:03 am
United States, 483 U. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:19 pm
[Kelly v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:39 am
United States. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:02 am
[Resolutions to approve the acceptance of foreign gifts and emoluments must be presented to the President] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] The Foreign Emoluments Clause provides that "[N]o Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:09 am
Altova GMBH v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:54 pm
Barrett Prettyman U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am
Indeed, the United States attempted and failed to make such a showing in Grupo Mexicano. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm
In 1987, Marshall was the deciding vote for the 5-4 majority in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 4:14 pm
In Barrett v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 12:17 pm
In Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am
Barrett’s detractors characterized the statement as criticism of Roe v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am
” Heather Long for the Washington Post reports that Collins “said Sunday she would not vote for any judge who wanted to end access to abortion in the United States by overturning Roe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
Jackson Lecture on the Supreme Court of the United States, on Wednesday, July 25, 2018, at 4:00 p.m. in Chautauqua’s Hall of Philosophy. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. [read post]
